• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Assessing Electronic Prescription: A Cross-sectional Study of Pharmacists in Germany].[评估电子处方:德国药剂师的横断面研究]
Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Oct;84(10):961-967. doi: 10.1055/a-1498-1816. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
2
How do community pharmacies recover from e-prescription errors?社区药房如何从电子处方错误中恢复过来?
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):837-852. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
3
Analysis of community chain pharmacists' interventions on electronic prescriptions.社区连锁药师对电子处方的干预分析
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Jan-Feb;49(1):59-64. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08013.
4
Transmitting and processing electronic prescriptions: experiences of physician practices and pharmacies.传输和处理电子处方:医师执业和药剂师的经验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):353-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000515. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
5
E-prescribing errors identified in a compounding pharmacy: a quality-improvement project.在一家复方药房中识别出的电子处方错误:一项质量改进项目。
Int J Pharm Compd. 2014 Jan-Feb;18(1):83-6.
6
Barriers and facilitators to recovering from e-prescribing errors in community pharmacies.社区药房电子处方错误纠正的障碍与促进因素
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2015 Jan-Feb;55(1):52-8. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2015.13239.
7
Barriers to electronic prescribing: Nebraska pharmacists' perspective.电子处方的障碍:内布拉斯加州药剂师的观点。
J Rural Health. 2013 Winter;29(1):119-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00438.x. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
8
Analysis of pharmacists' interventions on electronic versus traditional prescriptions in 2 community pharmacies.分析 2 家社区药店中电子处方与传统处方的药师干预情况。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012 Nov-Dec;8(6):523-32. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
9
The impact of electronic prescriptions on medication safety in Finnish community pharmacies: A survey of pharmacists.电子处方对芬兰社区药房用药安全的影响:药剂师调查
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Apr;100:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Nature and frequency of prescription modifications in community pharmacies: A nationwide study in the Netherlands.在社区药店中处方修改的性质和频率:荷兰全国性研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Mar;87(3):1455-1465. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14548. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Information and Communication Technology Based Integrated Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review.基于信息通信技术的老年人综合照护:一项范围综述
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Apr 3;23(2):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6979. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
[Acceptance of Care Offers for exclusive Remote Treatment Illustrated by the Telemedical Model Project "docdirekt" with a Mixed-Methods Design].[以混合方法设计的远程医疗模式项目“docdirekt”为例,对独家远程治疗护理提议的接受情况]
Gesundheitswesen. 2021 Mar;83(3):186-194. doi: 10.1055/a-1173-9903. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
[For discussion: The state of digitization of the German healthcare system].[供讨论:德国医疗保健系统的数字化状况]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Jun;143:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
3
The Connected Community Pharmacy: Benefits for Healthcare and Implications for Health Policy.互联社区药房:对医疗保健的益处及对卫生政策的影响
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Nov 28;9:1352. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01352. eCollection 2018.
4
[Recording and assessment of medication errors : Experience of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association].[药物差错的记录与评估:德国医学协会药物委员会的经验]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Sep;61(9):1066-1074. doi: 10.1007/s00103-018-2779-y.
5
Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review.评估全球采用远程医疗的障碍:系统评价。
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jan;24(1):4-12. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16674087. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
6
Community-level electronic prescribing and adverse drug event hospitalizations among older adults.社区层面的电子处方和老年人药物不良反应住院治疗。
Health Informatics J. 2019 Sep;25(3):661-675. doi: 10.1177/1460458217720396. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
7
A Copmarative Review of Electronic Prescription Systems: Lessons Learned from Developed Countries.电子处方系统的比较性综述:从发达国家汲取的经验教训。 需注意,原文中“Copmarative”拼写错误,正确应为“Comparative” 。
J Res Pharm Pract. 2017 Jan-Mar;6(1):3-11. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.200993.
8
[Drug-drug interactions in the elderly : Which ones really matter?].[老年人中的药物相互作用:哪些真的重要?]
Internist (Berl). 2016 Jul;57(7):728-34. doi: 10.1007/s00108-016-0078-y.
9
Barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic prescription: a systematic review of user groups' perceptions.实施电子处方的障碍和促进因素:用户群体感知的系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):535-41. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002203. Epub 2013 Oct 15.

[评估电子处方:德国药剂师的横断面研究]

[Assessing Electronic Prescription: A Cross-sectional Study of Pharmacists in Germany].

作者信息

Strumann Christoph, Möller Birger, Steinhäuser Jost

机构信息

Institute of Family Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Oct;84(10):961-967. doi: 10.1055/a-1498-1816. Epub 2021 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1055/a-1498-1816
PMID:34161985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9525142/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The GERDA ("Protected e-prescription service for pharmacies") project of the Chamber of Pharmacists (LAK) and Pharmacists Association (LAV) of the federal state of Baden-Wuerttemberg provided the opportunity to prescribe medications within the telemedical portal "docdirekt" that is operated by the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of Baden-Wuerttemberg. Against this background, the aim of the study was to explore and prioritize barriers and enablers among pharmacists to participate in a medical supply system that includes electronic prescriptions (e-prescriptions). Based on these determinants, recommendations for optimizing the successful implementation of similar care offers were derived.

METHOD

A mixed methods design was chosen to explore and prioritize the determinants. In the first step, determinants for participation in an electronic prescribing system were explored by means of individual interviews of docdirekt tele-physicians, primary care physicians and pharmacists. In a second step, these determinants were prioritized through a quantitative survey of pharmacists.

RESULTS

Out of the 523 pharmacists that answered the questionnaire, more than half were willing to participate in an e-prescription system, while 8.5% excluded future participation. A total of 18 determinants for the e-prescription system participation could be explored. The protection of the free pharmacy choice for the patients was identified as the most important determinant, followed by the option of a correction function for e-prescriptions (e. g. to avoid retaxing or medication errors), the integration of the e-prescription into the existing pharmacy IT system and the statutory exclusion of direct contracts with online pharmacies. Time savings and possibly higher remunerations were rated as less relevant.

CONCLUSION

More than half of the pharmacies surveyed stated that they wanted to participate in an e-prescription system. Widespread introduction of e-prescriptions in planned for January 2022. Successful implementation of this move will be facilitated if the identified determinants are taken into consideration by politics, software developers and associations.

摘要

背景

德国巴登 - 符腾堡州药剂师协会(LAK)和药剂师联合会(LAV)的GERDA项目(“面向药房的受保护电子处方服务”)提供了在由巴登 - 符腾堡州法定医疗保险医师协会运营的远程医疗门户“docdirekt”内开具药物处方的机会。在此背景下,本研究的目的是探索药剂师参与包括电子处方(e - 处方)在内的医疗供应系统的障碍和促进因素,并对其进行优先级排序。基于这些决定因素,得出了优化类似医疗服务成功实施的建议。

方法

选择混合方法设计来探索决定因素并对其进行优先级排序。第一步,通过对docdirekt远程医生、初级保健医生和药剂师进行个人访谈,探索参与电子处方系统的决定因素。第二步,通过对药剂师的定量调查对这些决定因素进行优先级排序。

结果

在523名回答问卷的药剂师中,超过一半愿意参与电子处方系统,而8.5%排除未来参与的可能性。总共可以探索出18个参与电子处方系统的决定因素。患者自由选择药房的保护被确定为最重要的决定因素,其次是电子处方的校正功能选项(例如避免重复征税或用药错误)、电子处方与现有药房信息技术系统的集成以及与在线药房直接签约的法定排除。节省时间和可能更高的报酬被认为相关性较低。

结论

超过一半接受调查的药房表示他们希望参与电子处方系统。计划于2022年1月广泛引入电子处方。如果政治、软件开发人员和协会考虑到已确定的决定因素,这一举措的成功实施将得到促进。