Suppr超能文献

发展超自然与灵异信仰量表的古典与现代测验理论。

Development of the Paranormal and Supernatural Beliefs Scale using classical and modern test theory.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Sport and Geography, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2021 Jun 23;9(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00600-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study describes the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring belief in paranormal phenomena. The work aims to address psychometric and conceptual shortcomings associated with existing measures of paranormal belief. The study also compares the use of classic test theory and modern test theory as methods for scale development.

METHOD

We combined novel items and amended items taken from existing scales, to produce an initial corpus of 29 items. Two hundred and thirty-one adult participants rated their level of agreement with each item using a seven-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Classical test theory methods (including exploratory factor analysis and principal components analysis) reduced the scale to 14 items and one overarching factor: Supernatural Beliefs. The factor demonstrated high internal reliability, with an excellent test-retest reliability for the total scale. Modern test theory methods (Rasch analysis using a rating scale model) reduced the scale to 13 items with a four-point response format. The Rasch scale was found to be most effective at differentiating between individuals with moderate-high levels of paranormal beliefs, and differential item functioning analysis indicated that the Rasch scale represents a valid measure of belief in paranormal phenomena.

CONCLUSIONS

The scale developed using modern test theory is identified as the final scale as this model allowed for in-depth analyses and refinement of the scale that was not possible using classical test theory. Results support the psychometric reliability of this new scale for assessing belief in paranormal phenomena, particularly when differentiating between individuals with higher levels of belief.

摘要

背景

本研究描述了一种新的测量超自然现象信仰的量表的构建和验证。这项工作旨在解决与超自然信仰现有测量方法相关的心理测量和概念上的缺陷。该研究还比较了经典测试理论和现代测试理论作为量表开发方法的使用。

方法

我们将新颖的项目和取自现有量表的修订项目结合起来,产生了一个由 29 个项目组成的初始语料库。231 名成年参与者使用七点李克特量表对每个项目的同意程度进行评分。

结果

经典测试理论方法(包括探索性因素分析和主成分分析)将量表简化为 14 个项目和一个总体因素:超自然信仰。该因素表现出较高的内部可靠性,量表的重测信度也很高。现代测试理论方法(使用评分量表模型的拉斯克分析)将量表简化为 13 个四分值的项目。发现拉什量表最能区分具有中高水平超自然信仰的个体,差异项目功能分析表明,拉什量表代表了一种对超自然现象信仰的有效测量。

结论

使用现代测试理论开发的量表被确定为最终的量表,因为这种模型允许对量表进行深入的分析和细化,而经典测试理论则无法做到这一点。结果支持了该新量表评估超自然现象信仰的心理测量可靠性,特别是在区分具有较高信仰水平的个体时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adf4/8220838/e4bd02f3734e/40359_2021_600_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
2
[French validation of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale].
Encephale. 2014 Sep;40(4):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 May 14.
3
Measuring extraordinary experiences and beliefs: A validation and reliability study.
F1000Res. 2019 Oct 11;8:1741. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.20409.3. eCollection 2019.
7
Paranormal beliefs and religiosity: Chinese version of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale.
Psychol Rep. 2010 Oct;107(2):367-82. doi: 10.2466/08.09.17.PR0.107.5.367-382.
9
Rasch Analysis of the Proactive Personality Scale.
Psychol Rep. 2022 Oct;125(5):2788-2806. doi: 10.1177/00332941211028110. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
10
Development and validation of a 6-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS-6) using Rasch analysis.
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(2):233-256. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12404. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Asian maternal experiences and mHealth needs for postpartum mental health care.
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 26;10:20552076241292679. doi: 10.1177/20552076241292679. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Prevalence, patterns and predictors of paranormal beliefs in The Netherlands: a several-analysts approach.
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Sep 4;11(9):240049. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240049. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Variations in Well-Being as a Function of Paranormal Belief and Psychopathological Symptoms: A Latent Profile Analysis.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 24;13:886369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886369. eCollection 2022.
5
Paranormal beliefs and cognitive function: A systematic review and assessment of study quality across four decades of research.
PLoS One. 2022 May 4;17(5):e0267360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267360. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
On the Adaptive Value of Paranormal Beliefs - a Qualitative Study.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Jun;55(2):318-328. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09594-5. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Gender role orientation, thinking style preference and facets of adult paranormality: A mediation analysis.
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Nov;76:102821. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102821. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
3
The Australian Sheep-Goat Scale: An Evaluation of Factor Structure and Convergent Validity.
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 28;9:1594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01594. eCollection 2018.
4
Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory in Individual Change Assessment.
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Nov;40(8):559-572. doi: 10.1177/0146621616664046. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
5
Tree-Based Global Model Tests for Polytomous Rasch Models.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Feb;78(1):128-166. doi: 10.1177/0013164416664394. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
6
The Moderating Effect of Mental Toughness: Perception of Risk and Belief in the Paranormal.
Psychol Rep. 2019 Feb;122(1):268-287. doi: 10.1177/0033294118756600. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
7
An Assessment of the Dimensionality and Factorial Structure of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale.
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 26;8:1693. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01693. eCollection 2017.
8
[French validation of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale].
Encephale. 2014 Sep;40(4):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 May 14.
9
Childhood trauma and the development of paranormal beliefs.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014 Apr;202(4):305-12. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000123.
10
Rasch Trees: A New Method for Detecting Differential Item Functioning in the Rasch Model.
Psychometrika. 2015 Jun;80(2):289-316. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9388-3. Epub 2013 Dec 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验