Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen.
Medical Statistics Team, University of Aberdeen.
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2021 Mar 22;6(1):1378. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1378.
To determine the feasibility of combining routinely recorded perinatal data from several databases in high-income countries to assess the risk of recurrent stillbirth.
Web-based questionnaire survey with reminder emails and searching of relevant country websites.
120 countries/regions in Canada, Europe and the USA were invited to participate and 83 (69%) responded. Of those one had no data, and two did not wish to take part. The remaining 80 were sent the questionnaire and 63 (53%) were completed. Twenty-seven countries/regions reported that they collect information on all perinatal events (including early pregnancy loss), 34 on live births and stillbirths and two only live births (stillbirths recorded in a separate database). Most countries (53/63) can link two or more pregnancies occurring in the same woman. Data and information extracted from the Australian and New Zealand Government websites showed that information on all perinatal events is collected nationally in New Zealand and in 5/8 regions in Australia. Both Australia and New Zealand can link two or more pregnancies occurring in the same woman. Maternal age and caffeine consumption were the most and least consistently collected demographic indicators respectively. Diabetes mellitus and mental health problems, birthweight and obstetric cholestasis the most and least consistently collected for medical conditions and pregnancy condition/complications. Procedures for gaining access to data vary between countries.
This study demonstrates that it is possible to link pregnancies in the same woman to assess the risk of recurrent stillbirth using routinely collected perinatal data in all states/territories in Australia, 7/8 responding provinces/territories in Canada, 21/27 responding countries/regions in Europe, New Zealand and 26/28 responding states in the USA. The scope of the databases and quality and extent of data collected (thus their potential use) varied, as did procedures for accessing their data.
确定在高收入国家联合使用常规记录的围产期数据库来评估复发性死胎风险的可行性。
通过网络问卷进行调查,并发送提醒电子邮件,同时搜索相关国家网站。
邀请了加拿大、欧洲和美国的 120 个国家/地区参与,其中 83 个国家/地区(69%)做出回应。其中一个国家没有数据,两个国家表示不想参与。其余 80 个国家/地区收到了问卷,其中 63 个国家/地区完成了问卷。27 个国家/地区报告称,他们收集所有围产期事件(包括早期妊娠丢失)的信息,34 个国家/地区报告称收集活产和死产的信息,两个国家/地区仅报告活产(死产记录在单独的数据库中)。大多数国家(53/63)可以将同一个女性的两次或多次妊娠联系起来。从澳大利亚和新西兰政府网站提取的数据和信息显示,新西兰全国范围内收集所有围产期事件的信息,而澳大利亚的 8 个地区中有 5 个地区可以将同一个女性的两次或多次妊娠联系起来。
母亲年龄和咖啡因摄入量是收集最多和最少的人口统计学指标。糖尿病和心理健康问题、出生体重和产科胆汁淤积症是收集最多和最少的医疗条件和妊娠情况/并发症。获取数据的程序因国家而异。
本研究表明,使用澳大利亚所有州/领地、加拿大 8 个回应省份/地区、欧洲 27 个回应国家/地区、新西兰和美国 28 个回应州的常规围产期数据,将同一个女性的妊娠联系起来评估复发性死胎的风险是可行的。数据库的范围、数据的质量和收集程度(因此其潜在用途)以及获取其数据的程序各不相同。