Suppr超能文献

高收入国家的胎儿和新生儿死亡率的国际比较:排除阈值是否应基于出生体重或胎龄?

International comparisons of fetal and neonatal mortality rates in high-income countries: should exclusion thresholds be based on birth weight or gestational age?

机构信息

Department of Child Health, TNO, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 May 20;8(5):e64869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064869. Print 2013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fetal and neonatal mortality rates are essential indicators of population health, but variations in recording of births and deaths at the limits of viability compromises international comparisons. The World Health Organization recommends comparing rates after exclusion of births with a birth weight less than 1000 grams, but many analyses of perinatal outcomes are based on gestational age. We compared the effects of using a 1000-gram birth weight or a 28-week gestational age threshold on reported rates of fetal and neonatal mortality in Europe.

METHODS

Aggregated data from 2004 on births and deaths tabulated by birth weight and gestational age from 29 European countries/regions participating in the Euro-Peristat project were used to compute fetal and neonatal mortality rates using cut-offs of 1000-grams and 28-weeks (2.8 million total births). We measured differences in rates between and within countries using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and 95% confidence intervals, respectively.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

For fetal mortality, rates based on gestational age were significantly higher than those based on birth weight (p<0.001), although these differences varied between countries. The use of a 1000-gram threshold included 8823 fetal deaths compared with 9535 using a 28-week threshold (difference of 712). In contrast, the choice of a cut-off made little difference for comparisons of neonatal deaths (difference of 16). Neonatal mortality rates differed minimally, by under 0.1 per 1000 in most countries (p = 0.370). Country rankings were comparable with both thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

Neonatal mortality rates were not affected by the choice of a threshold. However, the use of a 1000-gram threshold underestimated the health burden of fetal deaths. This may in part reflect the exclusion of growth restricted fetuses. In high-income countries with a good measure of gestational age, using a 28-week threshold may provide additional valuable information about fetal deaths occurring in the third trimester.

摘要

背景

胎儿和新生儿死亡率是人口健康的重要指标,但在极早产儿的出生和死亡记录方面存在差异,这影响了国际间的比较。世界卫生组织建议在排除出生体重低于 1000 克的婴儿后,对死亡率进行比较,但许多围产期结局的分析都是基于胎龄。我们比较了使用 1000 克出生体重或 28 周胎龄阈值对欧洲报告的胎儿和新生儿死亡率的影响。

方法

使用欧洲围产统计项目(Euro-Peristat project)29 个参与国家/地区汇总的 2004 年出生体重和胎龄数据,计算了使用 1000 克和 28 周(280 万例总出生)截断值的胎儿和新生儿死亡率。我们分别使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验和 95%置信区间测量了国家间和国家内的死亡率差异。

主要发现

对于胎儿死亡率,基于胎龄的死亡率明显高于基于出生体重的死亡率(p<0.001),尽管这些差异在国家间有所不同。使用 1000 克阈值包括 8823 例胎儿死亡,而使用 28 周阈值包括 9535 例(差异为 712)。相比之下,对于新生儿死亡的比较,选择截断值的差异很小(差异为 16)。在大多数国家,新生儿死亡率差异极小,不到每 1000 例 0.1 例(p=0.370)。两种阈值的国家排名都具有可比性。

结论

新生儿死亡率不受阈值选择的影响。然而,使用 1000 克阈值低估了胎儿死亡的健康负担。这在一定程度上可能反映了对生长受限胎儿的排除。在胎龄测量良好的高收入国家,使用 28 周阈值可能会提供有关第三孕期胎儿死亡的额外有价值的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/3658983/4332c1bf80c9/pone.0064869.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验