真相的轨迹：对虚幻真相效应的纵向研究
The Trajectory of Truth: A Longitudinal Study of the Illusory Truth Effect.
作者信息
Henderson Emma L, Simons Daniel J, Barr Dale J
机构信息
Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, Kingston University, Kingston Hill Campus, Kingston Hill, Kingston upon Thames, KT2 7LB, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
出版信息
J Cogn. 2021 Jun 8;4(1):29. doi: 10.5334/joc.161.
Repeated statements are rated as subjectively truer than comparable new statements, even though repetition alone provides no new, probative information (the . Contrary to some theoretical predictions, the illusory truth effect seems to be similar in magnitude for repetitions occurring after minutes or weeks. This Registered Report describes a longitudinal investigation of the illusory truth effect ( = 608, = 567 analysed) in which we systematically manipulated intersession interval (immediately, one day, one week, and one month) in order to test whether the illusory truth effect is immune to time. Both our hypotheses were supported: We observed an illusory truth effect at all four intervals (overall effect: (1) = 169.91; = 4.52, = 4.14; H1), with the effect diminishing as delay increased (H2). False information repeated over short timescales might have a greater effect on truth judgements than repetitions over longer timescales. Researchers should consider the implications of the choice of intersession interval when designing future illusory truth effect research.
重复陈述在主观上被认为比类似的新陈述更真实，尽管仅仅重复并不能提供新的、有证明力的信息（……）。与一些理论预测相反，对于几分钟或几周后出现的重复，虚幻真实效应的大小似乎相似。本预注册报告描述了一项关于虚幻真实效应的纵向调查（分析了608名被试，有效样本567名），其中我们系统地操纵了两次实验之间的间隔时间（立即、一天、一周和一个月），以测试虚幻真实效应是否不受时间影响。我们的两个假设都得到了支持：我们在所有四个时间间隔都观察到了虚幻真实效应（总体效应：F(1)=169.91；p<0.001，ηp2=0.22；支持假设1），并且随着延迟时间的增加，效应逐渐减弱（支持假设2）。在短时间尺度上重复的错误信息可能比长时间尺度上的重复对真相判断有更大的影响。研究人员在设计未来的虚幻真实效应研究时应考虑选择两次实验之间间隔时间的影响。
Zotero 插件