Khan Ilyas, Pintelon Liliane, Martin Harry
Center for Industrial Management, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
Faculty of Management, Sciences & Technology, Dutch Open University, Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands.
Med Decis Making. 2022 Feb;42(2):262-274. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211019040. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
The main objectives of this article are 2-fold. First, we explore the application of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods in different areas of health care, particularly the adoption of various MCDA methods across health care decision making problems. Second, we report on the publication trends on the application of MCDA methods in health care.
PubMed was searched for literature from 1960 to 2019 in the English language. A wide range of keywords was used to retrieve relevant studies. The literature search was performed in September 2019. Articles were included only if they have reported an MCDA case in health care.
The search yielded 8,318 abstracts, of which 158 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were considered for further analysis. Hybrid methods are the most widely used methods in health care decision making problems. When it comes to single methods, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is the most widely used method followed by TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution), multiattribute utility theory, goal programming, EVIDEM (evidence and value: impact on decision making), evidential reasoning, discrete choice experiment, and so on. Interestingly, the usage of hybrid methods has been high in recent years. AHP is most widely applied in screening and diagnosing and followed by treatment, medical devices, resource allocation, and so on. Furthermore, treatment, screening and diagnosing, medical devices, and drug development and assessment got more attention in the MCDA context. It is indicated that the application of MCDA methods to health care decision making problem is determined by the nature and complexity of the health care problem. However, guidelines and tools exist that assist in the selection of an MCDA method.
本文的主要目的有两个方面。首先,我们探讨多标准决策分析(MCDA)方法在医疗保健不同领域的应用,特别是各种MCDA方法在医疗保健决策问题中的采用情况。其次,我们报告MCDA方法在医疗保健中应用的发表趋势。
在PubMed中检索1960年至2019年的英文文献。使用了广泛的关键词来检索相关研究。文献检索于2019年9月进行。仅纳入报告了医疗保健中MCDA案例的文章。
检索得到8318篇摘要,其中158篇符合纳入标准并被考虑进行进一步分析。混合方法是医疗保健决策问题中使用最广泛的方法。就单一方法而言,层次分析法(AHP)是使用最广泛的方法,其次是逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)、多属性效用理论、目标规划、EVIDEM(证据与价值:对决策的影响)、证据推理、离散选择实验等。有趣的是,近年来混合方法的使用频率较高。AHP在筛查和诊断中应用最广泛,其次是治疗、医疗设备、资源分配等。此外,治疗、筛查和诊断、医疗设备以及药物研发与评估在MCDA背景下受到更多关注。这表明MCDA方法在医疗保健决策问题中的应用取决于医疗保健问题的性质和复杂性。然而,存在有助于选择MCDA方法的指南和工具。