Suppr超能文献

采用以全球利益相关者为中心的方法,对各国结核病疫苗准备情况研究进行优先排序。

Prioritizing countries for TB vaccine readiness research using a global stakeholder-centric approach.

作者信息

Gill Michelle M, Limaye Rupali, Pelzer Puck T, Frick Mike, Kerkhoff Andrew D

机构信息

Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington, DC, United States of America.

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Aug 1;5(8):e0004668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004668. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The promise of new tuberculosis (TB) vaccine candidates prompts the need for research on vaccine demand and health system readiness to help ensure effective and equitable vaccine deployment. We developed an approach to prioritizing countries for TB vaccine readiness research by combining stakeholder preferences, elicited through best-worst scaling (BWS) with an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) framework. We conducted a self-administered electronic survey targeting TB vaccine stakeholders involved in vaccine development, advocacy, and implementation across 23 of the 24 USAID TB priority countries, and key stakeholders working globally. The survey included BWS to determine the relative importance of 17 criteria for country selection. Stakeholders were recruited using an existing email list, a 'snowball' approach, and TB experts' recommendations. In a series of 13 choice tasks, respondents selected the most and least important criteria from four randomly generated criteria. The weights derived through BWS for each criterion were combined with country-specific scores for each criterion using publicly available data to determine the overall prioritization score for each country. Of 427 stakeholders, 115 (26%) completed the survey; 88% were from TB priority countries. Sixteen of 17 criteria were identified as 'important' using BWS. Overall country TB burden (weight = 11.1) and TB-related political will (weight = 10.3) were the most important, followed by burden of TB-related deaths (weight = 7.9), health systems strength (weight = 7.5), and adult COVID-19 coverage (weight = 7.4). The five countries with the highest prioritization scores were in sub-Saharan Africa. Three of them were selected alongside the highest-scoring country from South Asia, Europe and Central Asia, and East Asia as priority research settings in pursuit of regional diversity. This study demonstrates the successful use of the AHP combined with BWS, as a practical and transparent approach for prioritizing countries for TB vaccine readiness research which could be applied to support other evidence-based funding decisions in global public health.

摘要

新型结核病(TB)候选疫苗带来的希望促使人们开展关于疫苗需求以及卫生系统准备情况的研究,以帮助确保有效且公平地部署疫苗。我们开发了一种方法,通过将最佳-最差比例缩放法(BWS)得出的利益相关者偏好与层次分析法(AHP)框架相结合,对各国结核病疫苗准备情况研究进行优先排序。我们针对美国国际开发署(USAID)24个结核病重点国家中的23个国家以及全球范围内从事疫苗研发、宣传和实施工作的结核病疫苗利益相关者,开展了一项自行填写的电子调查。调查对象还包括全球范围内的关键利益相关者。该调查采用最佳-最差比例缩放法来确定17个国家选择标准的相对重要性。我们通过现有的电子邮件列表、“滚雪球”方法以及结核病专家的推荐来招募利益相关者。在一系列13项选择任务中,受访者从四个随机生成的标准中选出最重要和最不重要的标准。通过最佳-最差比例缩放法得出的每个标准的权重,与利用公开可得数据得出的每个标准的国家特定得分相结合,以确定每个国家的总体优先排序得分。在427名利益相关者中,115名(26%)完成了调查;88%来自结核病重点国家。采用最佳-最差比例缩放法确定,17个标准中有16个被认定为“重要”。国家总体结核病负担(权重=11.1)和结核病相关政治意愿(权重=10.3)最为重要,其次是结核病相关死亡负担(权重=7.9)、卫生系统实力(权重=7.5)以及成人新冠病毒疫苗接种覆盖率(权重=7.4)。优先排序得分最高的五个国家位于撒哈拉以南非洲地区。其中三个国家与来自南亚、欧洲和中亚以及东亚的得分最高的国家一同被选为优先研究地点,以实现区域多样性。本研究表明,层次分析法与最佳-最差比例缩放法相结合,作为一种实用且透明的方法,可用于对各国结核病疫苗准备情况研究进行优先排序,该方法可应用于支持全球公共卫生领域其他基于证据的资金决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29d/12316289/eda191c18559/pgph.0004668.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验