• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多标准决策分析在医疗保健中的应用:系统评价与文献计量分析

Application of multicriteria decision analysis in health care: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis.

作者信息

Adunlin Georges, Diaby Vakaramoko, Xiao Hong

机构信息

Division of Economic, Social and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):1894-905. doi: 10.1111/hex.12287. Epub 2014 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12287
PMID:25327341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4402125/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in health care has become common. However, the literature lacks systematic review trend analysis on the application of MCDA in health care.

AIM

To systematically identify applications of MCDA to the areas of health care, and to report on publication trends.

METHODS

English language studies published from January 1, 1980 until October 1, 2013 were included. Electronic databases searches were supplemented by searching conference proceedings and relevant journals. Studies considered for inclusion were those using MCDA techniques within the areas of health care, and involving the participation of decision makers. A bibliometric analysis was undertaken to present the publication trends.

RESULTS

A total of 66 citations met the inclusion criteria. An increase in publication trend occurred in the years 1990, 1997, 1999, 2005, 2008, and 2012. For the remaining years, the publication trend was either steady or declining. The trend shows that the number of publications reached its highest peak in 2012 (n = 9). Medical Decision Making was the dominant with the highest number published papers (n = 7). The majority of the studies were conducted in the US (n = 29). Medical Decision Making journal published the highest number of articles (n = 7). Analytic Hierarchy Process (n = 33) was the most used MCDA technique. Cancer was the most researched disease topic (n = 12). The most covered area of application was diagnosis and treatment (n = 26).

CONCLUSION

The review shows that MCDA has been applied to a broad range of areas in the health care, with the use of a variety of methodological approaches. Further research is needed to develop practice guidelines for the appropriate application and reporting of MCDA methods.

摘要

背景

多标准决策分析(MCDA)在医疗保健领域的应用已变得普遍。然而,文献中缺乏对MCDA在医疗保健领域应用的系统综述趋势分析。

目的

系统识别MCDA在医疗保健领域的应用,并报告其发表趋势。

方法

纳入1980年1月1日至2013年10月1日发表的英文研究。通过检索会议论文集和相关期刊对电子数据库搜索进行补充。纳入考虑的研究是那些在医疗保健领域使用MCDA技术且涉及决策者参与的研究。进行文献计量分析以呈现发表趋势。

结果

共有66篇文献符合纳入标准。在1990年、1997年、1999年、2005年、2008年和2012年出现发表趋势增加。在其余年份,发表趋势要么稳定要么下降。该趋势表明2012年发表数量达到最高峰(n = 9)。《医学决策》是主导期刊,发表论文数量最多(n = 7)。大多数研究在美国进行(n = 29)。《医学决策》期刊发表文章数量最多(n = 7)。层次分析法(n = 33)是最常用的MCDA技术。癌症是研究最多的疾病主题(n = 12)。应用最广泛的领域是诊断和治疗(n = 26)。

结论

该综述表明MCDA已应用于医疗保健的广泛领域,采用了多种方法学途径。需要进一步研究以制定MCDA方法适当应用和报告的实践指南。

相似文献

1
Application of multicriteria decision analysis in health care: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis.多标准决策分析在医疗保健中的应用:系统评价与文献计量分析
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):1894-905. doi: 10.1111/hex.12287. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
The Use of Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Decision Making in Healthcare: An Updated Systematic Literature Review.多准则决策分析在医疗保健决策中的应用:更新的系统文献综述。
Value Health. 2023 May;26(5):780-790. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.11.007. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中决策分析模型良好实践指南综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.
6
Use of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support decision-making during health emergencies: a scoping review.使用多标准决策分析(MCDA)支持卫生紧急情况期间的决策:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2025 May 9;13:1584026. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1584026. eCollection 2025.
7
Research status, hotspots and perspectives of artificial intelligence applied to pain management: a bibliometric and visual analysis.人工智能应用于疼痛管理的研究现状、热点与展望:一项文献计量学与可视化分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02296-w.
8
Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: a systematic review of Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).平衡医学创新不同阶段的成本与效益:多标准决策分析(MCDA)的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 9;15:262. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0930-0.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.

引用本文的文献

1
Global research trend of Herpes simplex keratitis: a bibliometric analysis and visualization from 1941 to 2024.单纯疱疹性角膜炎的全球研究趋势:1941年至2024年的文献计量分析与可视化
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 19;12:1526116. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1526116. eCollection 2025.
2
Interpretable personalized surgical recommendation with joint consideration of multiple decisional dimensions.综合考虑多个决策维度的可解释个性化手术推荐
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Mar 19;8(1):168. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01509-1.
3
Emerging research themes in maternal hypothyroidism: a bibliometric exploration.母性甲状腺功能减退症的新兴研究主题:文献计量学探索。
Front Immunol. 2024 Mar 26;15:1370707. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1370707. eCollection 2024.
4
Modelling the risk of Japanese encephalitis virus in Victoria, Australia, using an expert-systems approach.利用专家系统方法对澳大利亚维多利亚州日本脑炎病毒的风险进行建模。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08741-8.
5
Proposal of a Decision-Making Model for the Provisional Restoration Alternatives in Single-Tooth Implant Treatment.单颗牙种植治疗中临时修复方案决策模型的建议
Cureus. 2023 Sep 20;15(9):e45589. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45589. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
A scientometrics and visualization analysis of oxidative stress modulator Nrf2 in cancer profiles its characteristics and reveals its association with immune response.癌症中氧化应激调节剂Nrf2的科学计量学与可视化分析:剖析其特征并揭示其与免疫反应的关联
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 7;9(6):e17075. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17075. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Multi-criteria decision-making methods applied in health-insurance underwriting.多标准决策方法在健康保险承保中的应用。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2022 Jun 19;12(1):52-84. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2022.2085190. eCollection 2023.
8
Research trends in healthcare and hospital administration in Japan: Content analyses of article titles in the journal of the Japan society for healthcare administration.日本医疗保健与医院管理研究趋势:以《日本医院管理学会杂志》文章标题为分析内容
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 14;10:1050035. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1050035. eCollection 2022.
9
Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on the Omicron Variant from 2020 to 2022 in the Scopus Database Using R and VOSviewer.使用 R 和 VOSviewer 对 2020 年至 2022 年 Scopus 数据库中关于奥密克戎变异株的出版物进行文献计量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 29;19(19):12407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912407.
10
A Multi-Criteria Approach to Assess the Performance of the Brazilian Unified Health System.一种评估巴西统一卫生系统绩效的多标准方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 13;19(18):11478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811478.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the value of healthcare interventions using multi-criteria decision analysis: a review of the literature.使用多标准决策分析评估医疗保健干预措施的价值:文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Apr;32(4):345-65. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0135-0.
2
A pilot study of multicriteria decision analysis for valuing orphan medicines.多准则决策分析在评估孤儿药价值中的初步研究。
Value Health. 2013 Dec;16(8):1163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
3
Multiple criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment.健康技术评估的多准则决策分析。
Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):1172-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.015. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
4
Prioritizing investments in public health: a multi-criteria decision analysis.优先考虑对公共卫生的投资:多标准决策分析
J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Sep;35(3):460-6. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds099. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
5
Multicriteria decision analysis for including health interventions in the universal health coverage benefit package in Thailand.多准则决策分析在泰国全民健康覆盖福利包中纳入健康干预措施。
Value Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(6):961-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.006.
6
From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking.从疗效到公平:资源配置和医疗保健决策的决策标准文献综述。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2012 Jul 18;10(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-10-9.
7
Multi-criteria decision analysis for setting priorities on HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand.泰国艾滋病防治干预措施优先排序的多准则决策分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Feb 17;10:6. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-6.
8
Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences.将患者观点纳入卫生技术评估:层次分析法(AHP)作为一种 eliciting 患者偏好的方法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Oct;27(4):369-75. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000523.
9
Multi-criteria clinical decision support: A primer on the use of multiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare.多标准临床决策支持:关于使用多标准决策方法促进循证、以患者为中心的医疗保健的入门指南。
Patient. 2010;3(4):229-248. doi: 10.2165/11539470-000000000-00000.
10
Priority setting for health technology assessment at CADTH.加拿大药物和技术评估署(CADTH)的卫生技术评估优先排序。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Jul;26(3):341-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462310000383.