Diaz-Arocutipa Carlos, Benites-Meza Jerry K, Chambergo-Michilot Diego, Barboza Joshuan J, Pasupuleti Vinay, Bueno Héctor, Sambola Antonia, Hernandez Adrian V
Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.
Programa de Atención Domiciliaria - EsSalud, Lima, Peru.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 8;8:676771. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.676771. eCollection 2021.
Inflammation plays a key role in atherosclerotic plaque destabilization and adverse cardiac remodeling. Recent evidence has shown a promising role of colchicine in patients with coronary artery disease. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of colchicine in post-acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients. We searched five electronic databases from inception to January 18, 2021, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating colchicine in post-acute MI patients. Primary outcomes were cardiovascular mortality and recurrent MI. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, stroke, urgent coronary revascularization, levels of follow-up high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and drug-related adverse events. All meta-analyses used inverse-variance random-effects models. Six RCTs involving 6,005 patients were included. Colchicine did not significantly reduce cardiovascular mortality [risk ratio (RR), 0.91; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.52-1.61; = 0.64], recurrent MI (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.62-1.22; = 0.28), all-cause mortality (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.61-1.85; = 0.78), stroke (RR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.07-1.09; = 0.05), urgent coronary revascularization (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.02-8.89; = 0.19), or decreased levels of follow-up hs-CRP (mean difference, -1.95 mg/L; 95% CI, -12.88 to 8.98; = 0.61) compared to the control group. There was no increase in any adverse events (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.07; = 0.34) or gastrointestinal adverse events (RR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.48-12.99; = 0.20). Subgroup analyses by colchicine dose (0.5 vs. 1 mg/day), time of follow-up (<1 vs. ≥1 year), and treatment duration (≤30 vs. >30 days) showed no changes in the overall findings. In post-acute MI patients, colchicine does not reduce cardiovascular or all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, or other cardiovascular outcomes. Also, colchicine did not increase drug-related adverse events.
炎症在动脉粥样硬化斑块不稳定和不良心脏重塑中起关键作用。最近的证据表明秋水仙碱在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有潜在作用。我们评估了秋水仙碱在急性心肌梗死(MI)后患者中的疗效和安全性。我们检索了从数据库建立至2021年1月18日的五个电子数据库,以查找评估秋水仙碱在急性MI后患者中的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是心血管死亡率和复发性MI。次要结局是全因死亡率、中风、紧急冠状动脉血运重建、随访时高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平以及药物相关不良事件。所有荟萃分析均使用逆方差随机效应模型。纳入了六项涉及6005例患者的RCT。与对照组相比,秋水仙碱并未显著降低心血管死亡率[风险比(RR),0.91;95%置信区间(95%CI),0.52 - 1.61;P = 0.64]、复发性MI(RR,0.87;95%CI,0.62 - 1.22;P = 0.28)、全因死亡率(RR,1.06;95%CI,0.61 - 1.85;P = 0.78)、中风(RR,0.28;95%CI,0.07 - 1.09;P = 0.05)、紧急冠状动脉血运重建(RR,0.46;95%CI,0.02 - 8.89;P = 0.19),也未降低随访时hs-CRP水平(平均差,-1.95 mg/L;95%CI,-12.88至8.98;P = 0.61)。任何不良事件(RR,0.97;95%CI,0.89 - 1.07;P = 0.34)或胃肠道不良事件(RR,2.49;95%CI,0.48 - 12.99;P = 0.20)均未增加。按秋水仙碱剂量(0.5 vs. 1 mg/天)、随访时间(<1年vs.≥1年)和治疗持续时间(≤30天vs.>30天)进行的亚组分析显示总体结果无变化。在急性MI后患者中,秋水仙碱不能降低心血管或全因死亡率、复发性MI或其他心血管结局。此外,秋水仙碱也未增加药物相关不良事件。