Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Donghu District, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 1, Minde Road, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Donghu District, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17, Yongzhengwai Road, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;41(6):1873-1887. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06050-0. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
Colchicine is an ancient anti-inflammatory drug. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have shown that colchicine improves the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), while other studies have reported the opposite. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of colchicine in treating CAD.
PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 20 October 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing colchicine and placebo in patients with CAD. The primary outcomes were the primary composite outcomes of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, or ischemia-driven coronary revascularization after colchicine administration. The secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, death from any cause, noncardiac death, MI, ischemic stroke, coronary revascularization, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, and the different effects of colchicine in acute and chronic CAD. We assessed the pooled odds ratio (OR) of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality for CAD in fixed-effects models, the pooled risk ratio (RR) of the primary composite outcomes, MI, ischemic stroke, and ischemia-driven coronary revascularization in fixed-effects models and the pooled RR of GI symptoms in random-effects models. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included RCTs.
Eleven of the 894 identified studies (n = 12,899 patients) were included (6501 subjects in the colchicine group; 6389 subjects in the control group). The colchicine group had significantly lower pooled RRs of the primary composite outcomes (0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.84, P < 0.0001), MI (0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.92, P = 0.004), ischemic stroke (0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.76, P = 0.002), and ischemia-driven coronary revascularization (0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.89, P = 0.0007), while the pooled RR of adverse GI events (2.15 95% CI 1.40-3.31, P = 0.0005) was significantly higher. Colchicine had a lower pooled RR of ischemic stroke (0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.65, P = 0.003) for patients with acute compared with chronic CAD.
Colchicine treatment significantly decreased the risk of primary cardiovascular composite outcomes, MI, ischemic stroke, and ischemia-driven coronary revascularization in CAD patients but increased adverse GI events. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and non-cardiovascular death between the colchicine and control groups. Colchicine performs better in acute CAD patients with ischemic stroke than chronic CAD patients. Colchicine might be a new treatment for patients with CAD.
秋水仙碱是一种古老的抗炎药物。近年来,越来越多的研究表明秋水仙碱改善了冠心病(CAD)患者的预后,而其他研究则报告了相反的结果。本研究旨在评估秋水仙碱治疗 CAD 的相对疗效和安全性。
从建库至 2020 年 10 月 20 日,我们在 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 ClinicalTrials.gov 上搜索了比较 CAD 患者秋水仙碱和安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是秋水仙碱治疗后的心血管死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、缺血性卒中和缺血驱动的冠状动脉血运重建的主要复合结局。次要结局是心血管死亡、任何原因死亡、非心脏死亡、MI、缺血性卒中和冠状动脉血运重建、胃肠道(GI)症状以及秋水仙碱在急性和慢性 CAD 中的不同作用。我们在固定效应模型中评估了 CAD 全因和心血管死亡率的所有原因和心血管死亡率的汇总比值比(OR),在固定效应模型中评估了主要复合结局、MI、缺血性卒中和缺血驱动的冠状动脉血运重建的汇总风险比(RR),在随机效应模型中评估了 GI 症状的汇总 RR。我们使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估了纳入 RCT 的偏倚风险。
在 894 项确定的研究中,有 11 项(n=12899 例患者)被纳入(秋水仙碱组 6501 例,对照组 6389 例)。秋水仙碱组主要复合结局的汇总 RR 显著降低(0.73,95%置信区间(CI)0.64-0.84,P<0.0001)、MI(0.77,95% CI 0.64-0.92,P=0.004)、缺血性卒中和缺血驱动的冠状动脉血运重建(0.77,95% CI 0.66-0.89,P=0.0007),而不良 GI 事件的汇总 RR(2.15,95% CI 1.40-3.31,P=0.0005)显著升高。秋水仙碱对急性 CAD 患者的缺血性卒中和慢性 CAD 患者的缺血性卒中有较低的汇总 RR(0.28,95% CI 0.12-0.65,P=0.003)。
秋水仙碱治疗可显著降低 CAD 患者的主要心血管复合结局、MI、缺血性卒中和缺血驱动的冠状动脉血运重建的风险,但增加了不良的胃肠道事件。秋水仙碱组和对照组的全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和非心血管死亡率无显著差异。秋水仙碱在急性 CAD 伴缺血性卒中和慢性 CAD 患者中的疗效更好。秋水仙碱可能成为 CAD 患者的一种新的治疗方法。