• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

储存前于低温与室温条件下去白细胞对红细胞效果的实验室与临床比较。

Laboratory and clinical comparison of the efficacy of prestorage leukoreduction of red cells at cold versus room temperature.

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2021 Sep;61(9):2556-2565. doi: 10.1111/trf.16570. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1111/trf.16570
PMID:34169541
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The temperature at which filtration takes place has been reported to influence the efficacy of leukoreduction. We aimed to compare the residual leukocyte count (RLC) in red cell units (RCUs) filtered at cold (CT) versus room temperature (RT) and to assess whether this correlates clinically with a difference in the incidence of acute transfusion reactions (ATRs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In the first part of the study, whole blood units collected were randomly allocated for subsequent filtration at CT and RT, respectively. RLC postfiltration was assessed using flow cytometry. The second part of the study was a nonrandomized clinical trial in which incidence of ATR was compared between RCUs filtered at RT and CT for 6 months each.

RESULTS

Thirty-five RCUs each underwent leukofiltration at CT and RT, respectively. The median RLCs in the filtered units at CT and RT were 0.02 × 10 and 0.1 × 10 leukocytes/unit, respectively (p = .0001), with no difference in red blood cell (RBC) recovery (p = .41). During the second part, 3455 RCUs filtered at RT and 3539 RCUs filtered at CT were transfused to patients. The rate of febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reaction (FNHTR) among transfused patients was less with units filtered at CT (1 per 2000 transfusions) in comparison to RT (1 per 588 transfusions). The difference was, however, not significant (p = .14).

CONCLUSION

If change in temperature alone can cause significant reduction in leukocytes, then it is a simple way to curtail the rate of this common yet unpleasant reaction and reduce the reaction rate at minimal cost.

摘要

背景

已有研究报道过滤时的温度会影响白细胞去除的效果。我们旨在比较在冷(CT)与室温(RT)条件下过滤的红细胞单位(RCU)中的残留白细胞计数(RLC),并评估其与急性输血反应(ATR)发生率差异的临床相关性。

方法和材料

在研究的第一部分中,采集的全血单位随机分配用于随后在 CT 和 RT 下进行过滤,分别。过滤后使用流式细胞术评估 RLC。研究的第二部分为非随机临床试验,比较了在 RT 和 CT 下过滤的 RCU 在 6 个月内的 ATR 发生率。

结果

分别有 35 个 RCU 在 CT 和 RT 下进行白细胞滤除,在 CT 和 RT 下过滤后的单位中的 RLC 中位数分别为 0.02×10 和 0.1×10 白细胞/单位(p=0.0001),红细胞(RBC)回收率无差异(p=0.41)。在第二部分中,3455 个在 RT 下过滤的 RCU 和 3539 个在 CT 下过滤的 RCU 被输注给患者。与在 RT 下过滤的单位相比(每 588 次输注中发生 1 次),在 CT 下过滤的单位中输注患者的发热性非溶血性输血反应(FNHTR)发生率较低(每 2000 次输注中发生 1 次)。然而,差异无统计学意义(p=0.14)。

结论

如果仅仅改变温度就能显著减少白细胞,那么这是一种简单的方法,可以降低这种常见但令人不快的反应发生率,并以最小的成本降低反应率。

相似文献

1
Laboratory and clinical comparison of the efficacy of prestorage leukoreduction of red cells at cold versus room temperature.储存前于低温与室温条件下去白细胞对红细胞效果的实验室与临床比较。
Transfusion. 2021 Sep;61(9):2556-2565. doi: 10.1111/trf.16570. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
2
Pre-storage leucocyte depletion and transfusion reaction rates in cancer patients.癌症患者输血前白细胞去除与输血反应发生率
Transfus Med. 2005 Feb;15(1):37-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2005.00546.x.
3
Use of a prestorage leukoreduction filter effectively removes leukocytes from canine whole blood while preserving red blood cell viability.使用预储存白细胞滤除器可有效从犬全血中去除白细胞,同时保持红细胞活力。
J Vet Intern Med. 2000 Jul-Aug;14(4):412-7. doi: 10.1892/0891-6640(2000)014<0412:uoaplf>2.3.co;2.
4
Infusion of P-Capt prion-filtered red blood cell products demonstrate acceptable in vivo viability and no evidence of neoantigen formation.输注 P-Capt 朊病毒过滤的红细胞产品表现出可接受的体内活力,并且没有新抗原形成的证据。
Transfusion. 2011 Oct;51(10):2228-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03133.x. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
5
Prestorage universal WBC reduction of RBC units does not affect the incidence of transfusion reactions.红细胞单位储存前普遍白细胞去除不影响输血反应的发生率。
Transfusion. 2001 Aug;41(8):997-1000. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41080997.x.
6
Prestorage leukoreduction and low-temperature filtration reduce hemolysis of stored red cell concentrates.储存前白细胞滤除和低温过滤可减少储存红细胞浓缩液的溶血。
Transfusion. 2005 Jan;45(1):90-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04061.x.
7
Reduction of febrile but not allergic reactions to RBCs and platelets after conversion to universal prestorage leukoreduction.转换为通用的预储存白细胞去除后,发热反应减少,但对红细胞和血小板的过敏反应未减少。
Transfusion. 2004 Jan;44(1):16-24. doi: 10.1046/j.0041-1132.2004.00608.x.
8
Hypothermic storage of leukoreduced red blood cells for greater than 21 days is a safe alternative to irradiation.白细胞减少的红细胞在低于 21 天的低温储存是辐照的安全替代方法。
Transfusion. 2021 Apr;61(4):1247-1257. doi: 10.1111/trf.16273. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
9
Evaluation of a new prestorage leukoreduction filter for red blood cell units.新型红细胞单位储存前白细胞滤除器的评估
Vox Sang. 1997;72(2):101-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.1997.7220101.x.
10
Impact of the preparation method of red cell concentrates on transfusion indices in thalassemia patients: A randomized crossover clinical trial.红细胞浓缩液制备方法对地中海贫血患者输血指标的影响:一项随机交叉临床试验。
Transfusion. 2021 Jun;61(6):1729-1739. doi: 10.1111/trf.16432. Epub 2021 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of pre-storage leukoreduction on erythrocyte concentrates and performance of newer generation leuko-filters at a tertiary care oncology hospital in Western India.印度西部一家三级肿瘤专科医院中,储存前白细胞滤除对红细胞浓缩物的影响以及新一代白细胞滤器的性能
Afr J Lab Med. 2025 Jun 25;14(1):2723. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v14i1.2723. eCollection 2025.
2
Research progress on febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reaction: a narrative review.发热性非溶血性输血反应的研究进展:一项叙述性综述
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(24):1401. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4932.
3
Long-term Effects of Regular Whole Blood Donation on Peripheral Blood CD34 Cells Population with using Leukoreduction Filters.
使用白细胞滤除器定期全血捐献对外周血CD34细胞群的长期影响。
Iran J Pathol. 2022 Summer;17(3):335-341. doi: 10.30699/IJP.2022.540459.2746. Epub 2022 Aug 16.