From the Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (YQ, JW, QH, YL, MX), the Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic (YQ, EJM, DY, II, DIS), the Outcomes Research Consortium (JW), the Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA (EJM, DY), the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Anaesthesiology Clinical Research Office, Erzurum, Turkey (II).
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Aug 1;38(Suppl 2):S97-S105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001450.
Serratus anterior plane blocks (SAPBs) and thoracic paravertebral blocks (TPVBs) can both be used for video-assisted thoracic surgery. However, it remains unknown whether the analgesic efficacy of a SAPB is comparable to that of a TPVB.
We tested the primary hypothesis that SAPBs provide noninferior analgesia compared with TPVBs for video-assisted thoracic surgery.
A noninferiority randomised trial.
Shanghai Chest Hospital, between August 2018 and November 2018.
Ninety patients scheduled for video-assisted thoracic lobectomy or segmentectomy were randomised. Patients were excluded if they were unable to perform the visual analogue pain scale, or surgery was converted to thoracotomy.
Blocks were performed after induction of general anaesthesia. The three groups were paravertebral blocks (n = 30); serratus anterior plane blocks (n = 29); and general anaesthesia alone (n = 30).
Visual analogue pain scores (0 to 10 cm) at rest and while coughing, and Prince-Henry pain scores (0 to 4 points) were used to assess postoperative analgesia at 2, 24 and 48 h after surgery. We assessed the noninferiority of SAPBs with TPVBs on all three primary pain outcomes using a delta of 1 cm or one point as appropriate.
The mean difference (95% confidence intervals) in visual analogue scores between the SAPBs and TPVBs was -0.04 (-0.10 to 0.03) cm at rest, -0.22 (-0.43 to -0.01) cm during coughing and -0.10 (-0.25 to 0.05) for Prince-Henry pain scores. As the upper limit of the confidence intervals were less than 1 (all P < 0.001), noninferiority was claimed for all three primary outcomes. Compared with general anaesthesia alone, the VAS scores at rest and while coughing, and the Prince-Henry pain scores for the two blocks were significantly lower during the initial 2 h after surgery.
Serratus anterior plane blocks are quicker and easier to perform than paravertebral blocks and provide comparable analgesia in patients having video-assisted thoracic surgery. Both blocks provided analgesia that was superior to general anaesthesia alone during the initial 2 h after surgery.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier: ChiCTR1800017671.
胸肌前平面阻滞(SAPB)和胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)均可用于电视辅助胸腔镜手术。然而,SAPB 的镇痛效果是否与 TPVB 相当仍不清楚。
我们检验了 SAPB 提供的非劣效镇痛与 TPVB 相当的主要假设,用于电视辅助胸腔镜手术。
非劣效性随机试验。
上海胸科医院,2018 年 8 月至 2018 年 11 月。
90 例拟行电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术或肺段切除术的患者被随机分组。如果患者无法进行视觉模拟疼痛评分,或手术转为开胸手术,则排除患者。
在全身麻醉诱导后进行阻滞。三组分别为椎旁阻滞(n=30);胸肌前平面阻滞(n=29);单纯全身麻醉(n=30)。
术后 2、24 和 48 小时,静息时和咳嗽时的视觉模拟疼痛评分(0 至 10cm)和 Prince-Henry 疼痛评分(0 至 4 分)用于评估术后镇痛。我们使用适当的 1cm 或 1 分差值,评估 SAPB 与 TPVB 在所有三个主要疼痛结局上的非劣效性。
SAPB 与 TPVB 在静息时的视觉模拟评分差值的平均值(95%置信区间)为-0.04(-0.10 至 0.03)cm,咳嗽时为-0.22(-0.43 至 -0.01)cm,Prince-Henry 疼痛评分差值为-0.10(-0.25 至 0.05)。由于置信区间的上限小于 1(均 P<0.001),因此声称所有三个主要结局均具有非劣效性。与单纯全身麻醉相比,在术后最初 2 小时内,两种阻滞的静息时和咳嗽时的 VAS 评分以及 Prince-Henry 疼痛评分均显著降低。
与椎旁阻滞相比,胸肌前平面阻滞更快、更容易操作,在接受电视辅助胸腔镜手术的患者中提供相当的镇痛效果。两种阻滞在术后最初 2 小时内提供的镇痛效果均优于单纯全身麻醉。
中国临床试验注册中心,注册号:ChiCTR1800017671。