Suppr超能文献

对比超声引导下双侧深浅层前锯肌平面阻滞与胸椎旁神经阻滞用于胸腔镜手术后的镇痛效果。

Comparison of combined deep and superficial serratus anterior block with thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Atatürk Sanatoryum Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkiye.

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkiye.

出版信息

Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Aug 4;54(5):1021-1032. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5881. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is a well-established procedure for the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). In recent years, there have been studies suggesting that fascial plane blocks may be an alternative to TPVB. The objective of our study was to determine the efficacy of combined deep and superficial serratus anterior block (C-SAPB) as an alternative to TPVB in the management of postoperative analgesia in VATS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients were divided into two groups: the TPVB group and the C-SAPB group. Both groups were administered the same dose of local anesthetics. Multimodal analgesia was achieved for the groups. The primary outcome measure was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores recorded within the first 48 h of the postoperative period in each group. The secondary outcomes were analgesic requirement, rescue analgesics, complications rate, and postoperative patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with C-SAPB and 30 patients with TPVB were analysed. VAS rest and VAS coughing scores were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Demographic and side effect conditions, total morphine use, additional analgesic needs, vital parameters, block procedure time, and patient satisfaction were also similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, although block application times were comparable, the time was slightly shorter in C-SAPB.

CONCLUSION

Similar analgesic efficacy was observed between C-SAPB and TPVB. TPVB maintains its place among the first choices in VATS. The efficacy of C-SAPB is comparable to that of TPVB. While the duration of C-SAPB application is not a significant factor, the brief nature of the procedure and its straightforward administration suggest that it may be an effective method.

摘要

背景/目的:胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)是一种用于管理接受电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)患者术后疼痛的成熟方法。近年来,有研究表明筋膜平面阻滞可能是 TPVB 的替代方法。我们的研究目的是确定联合深层和浅层前锯肌阻滞(C-SAPB)作为替代 TPVB 用于 VATS 术后镇痛的效果。

材料和方法

患者分为两组:TPVB 组和 C-SAPB 组。两组均给予相同剂量的局部麻醉剂。两组均采用多模式镇痛。主要观察指标是两组患者术后 48 小时内的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。次要观察指标为镇痛需求、解救性镇痛药物、并发症发生率和术后患者满意度。

结果

30 例患者接受 C-SAPB,30 例患者接受 TPVB。两组患者的静息 VAS 评分和咳嗽 VAS 评分相似(p>0.05)。人口统计学和副作用情况、总吗啡用量、额外镇痛需求、生命体征、阻滞程序时间和患者满意度在两组之间也相似(p>0.05)。此外,尽管阻滞应用时间相当,但 C-SAPB 的时间略短。

结论

C-SAPB 和 TPVB 观察到相似的镇痛效果。TPVB 在 VATS 中仍然是首选之一。C-SAPB 的疗效与 TPVB 相当。虽然 C-SAPB 的应用时间不是一个重要因素,但该程序的简单性和其直接给药的特点表明它可能是一种有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验