Suppr超能文献

超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与胸椎旁神经阻滞联合肋间神经阻滞在电视辅助胸腔镜手术中用于疼痛管理的疗效比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。

Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block combined with intercostal nerve block for pain management in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Huzhou Central Hospital, 1558# Sanhuan North Road, Huzhou, 313000, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Sep 10;22(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01823-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block(ESPB) and thoracic paravertebral block(TPVB) combined with intercostal nerve block(ICNB) after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS).

METHODS

Patients were enrolled into three groups according to analgesia technique as ICNB, TPVB + ICNB or ESPB + ICNB: respectively Group C(n = 58), Group T (n = 56) and Group E (n = 59). Patients were followed up by a trained data investigator at 2, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48 h after surgery, and the visual analog scale(VAS) at rest and coughing were recorded. The moderate and severe pain mean VAS ≥ 4 when coughing. The postoperative opioids consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), supplementary analgesic requirements within 48 h, length of stay in PACU, ambulation time, postoperative days in hospital and potential side effects, such as hematoma, hypotension, bradycardia, hypersomnia, uroschesis, pruritus and apnea were recorded.

RESULTS

The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain was no significant difference between 3 groups in 24 h and 48 h (P = 0.720). There was no significant difference among the 3 groups in the resting pain intensity at 2, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery(P > 0.05). In 2-way analysis of variance, the VAS when coughing in Group T were lower than that in Group C (mean difference = 0.15, 95%CI, 0.02 to 0.29; p = 0.028). While no difference was found when comparing Group E with Group C or Group T(P > 0.05). There was no difference between the three groups in the sufentanil consumption( within 24 h p = 0.472, within 48 h p = 0.158) and supplementary analgesic requirements(p = 0.910). The incidence of PONV and the length of stay in PACU, ambulation time and postoperative days in hospital were comparable in the 3 groups(P > 0.05). Two patients from Group T developed hematoma at the site of puncture.

CONCLUSIONS

The present randomized trial showed that the analgesic effect of TPVB + ICNB was superior to that of INCB after VATS, the analgesic effect of ESPB was equivalent to that of TPVB and ICNB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100049578. Registered 04 Aug 2020 Retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)和胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)联合肋间神经阻滞(ICNB)在电视辅助胸腔镜手术后(VATS)的镇痛效果。

方法

根据镇痛技术将患者分为三组:ICNB 组(n=58)、TPVB+ICNB 组(n=56)和 ESPB+ICNB 组(n=59)。由经过培训的数据调查员在术后 2、6、8、12、24 和 48 小时对患者进行随访,记录静息和咳嗽时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。中度和重度疼痛定义为咳嗽时 VAS 均值≥4。记录术后阿片类药物用量、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率、48 小时内辅助镇痛需求、PACU 停留时间、活动时间、住院天数以及潜在的副作用,如血肿、低血压、心动过缓、过度嗜睡、尿潴留、瘙痒和呼吸暂停。

结果

在术后 24 小时和 48 小时,三组中度至重度疼痛的发生率无显著差异(P=0.720)。三组在术后 2、6、8、12、24 和 48 小时静息疼痛强度无显著差异(P>0.05)。在 2 因素方差分析中,与 C 组相比,T 组咳嗽时的 VAS 较低(均数差值=0.15,95%CI,0.02 至 0.29;p=0.028)。而 E 组与 C 组或 T 组比较时差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组舒芬太尼用量(24 小时内 p=0.472,48 小时内 p=0.158)和辅助镇痛需求无差异(p=0.910)。三组 PONV 发生率、PACU 停留时间、活动时间和住院天数无差异(P>0.05)。T 组有 2 例患者在穿刺部位出现血肿。

结论

本随机试验表明,与 VATS 后 ICNB 相比,TPVB+ICNB 的镇痛效果更好,ESPB 的镇痛效果与 TPVB 和 ICNB 相当。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2100049578。注册于 2020 年 8 月 4 日,回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d11/9463827/9f240e584662/12871_2022_1823_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验