Shaw Rajib, Kim Yong-Kyun, Hua Jinling
Keio University, Japan.
Ministry of Interior and Safety, Republic of Korea.
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020 Apr;6:100090. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100090. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
Corona Virus (CODID-19) was first reported in Wuhan in December 2019, then spread in different parts of China, and gradually became a global pandemic in March 2020. While the death toll is still increasing, the epicenter of casualty has shifted from Asia to Europe, and that of the affected people has shifted to USA. This paper analyzes the responses in East Asian countries, in China, Japan and South Korea, and provides some commonalities and lessons. While countries have different governance mechanism, it was found that a few governance decisions in respective countries made a difference, along with strong community solidarity and community behavior. Extensive use of emerging technologies is made along with medical/health care treatment to make the response more effective and reduce the risk of the spread of the disease. Although the pandemic was a global one, its responses were local, depending on the local governance, socio-economic and cultural context.
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020-4
BMC Public Health. 2021-5-1
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-3-30
Philipp Geogr J. 1980
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2021-3-22
J Med Internet Res. 2021-2-1
Policing (Oxf). 2020-12-28
J Conting Crisis Manag. 2022-3
Biosensors (Basel). 2025-1-2
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024-9-19
Front Public Health. 2024
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-3-30
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2020-2