Shah Jai L, Scott Jan, McGorry Patrick D, Cross Shane P M, Keshavan Matcheri S, Nelson Barnaby, Wood Stephen J, Marwaha Steven, Yung Alison R, Scott Elizabeth M, Öngür Dost, Conus Philippe, Henry Chantal, Hickie Ian B
Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montreal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
ACCESS Open Minds, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
World Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;19(2):233-242. doi: 10.1002/wps.20745.
Recognizing that current frameworks for classification and treatment in psychiatry are inadequate, particularly for use in young people and early intervention services, transdiagnostic clinical staging models have gained prominence. These models aim to identify where individuals lie along a continuum of illness, to improve treatment selection and to better understand patterns of illness continuity, discontinuity and aetiopathogenesis. All of these factors are particularly relevant to help-seeking and mental health needs experienced during the peak age range of onset, namely the adolescent and young adult developmental periods (i.e., ages 12-25 years). To date, progressive stages in transdiagnostic models have typically been defined by traditional symptom sets that distinguish "sub-threshold" from "threshold-level" disorders, even though both require clinical assessment and potential interventions. Here, we argue that staging models must go beyond illness progression to capture additional dimensions of illness extension as evidenced by emergence of mental or physical comorbidity/complexity or a marked change in a linked biological construct. To develop further consensus in this nascent field, we articulate principles and assumptions underpinning transdiagnostic clinical staging in youth mental health, how these models can be operationalized, and the implications of these arguments for research and development of new service systems. We then propose an agenda for the coming decade, including knowledge gaps, the need for multi-stakeholder input, and a collaborative international process for advancing both science and implementation.
认识到当前精神病学的分类和治疗框架并不完善,尤其是在用于年轻人和早期干预服务时,跨诊断临床分期模型已受到关注。这些模型旨在确定个体在疾病连续体上的位置,以改善治疗选择,并更好地理解疾病连续性、不连续性和病因发病机制的模式。所有这些因素对于在发病高峰期年龄段(即青少年和青年成年期,即12至25岁)所经历的求助行为和心理健康需求尤为相关。迄今为止,跨诊断模型中的渐进阶段通常由传统症状集定义,这些症状集区分了“亚阈值”和“阈值水平”障碍,尽管两者都需要临床评估和潜在干预。在此,我们认为分期模型必须超越疾病进展,以捕捉疾病扩展的其他维度,如精神或身体共病/复杂性的出现或相关生物学结构的显著变化所证明的那样。为了在这个新兴领域达成进一步共识,我们阐述了支撑青少年心理健康跨诊断临床分期的原则和假设、这些模型如何实施,以及这些论点对新服务系统研发的影响。然后,我们提出了未来十年的议程,包括知识差距、多利益相关方投入的必要性,以及推进科学和实施的协作国际进程。