Suppr超能文献

定义自我报告的 ART 依从性的最佳切点,以在当代 HIV 治疗时代实现病毒抑制:一项横断面研究。

Defining the optimal cut-point of self-reported ART adherence to achieve viral suppression in the era of contemporary HIV therapy: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

SHARC Center for Translational HIV Research, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, 32610, USA.

SCHARP, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Res Ther. 2021 Jun 26;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12981-021-00358-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

When considering adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV, many different cut-points are used. The primary goals of this study were to identify a level of self-reported medication adherence that best distinguished HIV viral suppression from non-suppression, and to compare the ability of a single-item and a 3-item adherence questionnaire to predict HIV viral suppression.

METHODS

This cross-sectional analysis included 380 persons with HIV (PWH) from the Florida Cohort study who completed a self-reported ART adherence measure within 30-days of having an HIV viral load test. We used Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses and ROCContrast to compare the ability of a single-item and a 3-item self-reported adherence measure to predict HIV viral suppression (defined as ≤ 200 copies/mL). We used the Youden index and chi square statistics to assess specific cut-points, and repeated the analysis with a different definition of HIV viral suppression (≤ 1000 copies/mL).

RESULTS

The mean percent adherence was 92.4% using the single-item score and 90.4% using the 3-item score; 81.6% had viral suppression. The areas under the curve for the single-item and 3-item adherence measures were generally poor overall and not significantly different from each other (0.589 and 0.580, p = 0.67). The Youden index identified cut-points of 93% and 89% as maximizing the sensitivity and specificity for the single-item and 3-item measures, respectively, whereas a cut-point of 80% on the single-item measure was best able to discriminate those with viral suppression (58% vs. 84%, p < 0.001). Results were similar with viral suppression defined as ≤ 1000 copies/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample of PWH, a single question on medication adherence was as good as a 3-item questionnaire in predicting HIV viral suppression, although neither had good discriminatory ability. A cut-point close to 90% adherence maximized sensitivity and specificity, although viral suppression was very similar for nearly all measures above 80%.

摘要

背景

在考虑抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)对 HIV 的依从性时,会使用许多不同的切点。本研究的主要目的是确定一个最佳的自我报告药物依从性水平,以区分 HIV 病毒抑制与非抑制,并比较单项和三项依从性问卷预测 HIV 病毒抑制的能力。

方法

本横断面分析包括佛罗里达队列研究中的 380 名 HIV 感染者(PWH),他们在进行 HIV 病毒载量检测的 30 天内完成了自我报告的 ART 依从性测量。我们使用接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析和 ROCContrast 来比较单项和三项自我报告的依从性测量预测 HIV 病毒抑制(定义为 ≤ 200 拷贝/ml)的能力。我们使用 Youden 指数和卡方统计来评估特定的切点,并使用不同的 HIV 病毒抑制定义(≤ 1000 拷贝/ml)重复分析。

结果

使用单项评分,平均依从率为 92.4%,使用三项评分,平均依从率为 90.4%;81.6%的患者病毒得到抑制。单项和三项依从性测量的曲线下面积总体上较差,彼此之间无显著差异(0.589 和 0.580,p = 0.67)。Youden 指数确定的切点为 93%和 89%,分别为单项和三项测量的敏感性和特异性最大化,而单项测量的 80%切点最能区分病毒抑制者(58%比 84%,p < 0.001)。当将病毒抑制定义为 ≤ 1000 拷贝/ml 时,结果相似。

结论

在本 HIV 感染者样本中,一个关于药物依从性的问题与一个 3 项问卷在预测 HIV 病毒抑制方面一样好,尽管两者都没有很好的区分能力。接近 90%的依从性切点最大化了敏感性和特异性,尽管几乎所有高于 80%的指标都非常相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01bf/8234726/15d11f691989/12981_2021_358_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验