Bayly Benjamin L, Vasilenko Sara A
Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education; Pennsylvania State University.
Department of Human Development and Family Science, Syracuse University.
Int J Behav Dev. 2021 Jul 1;45(4):355-367. doi: 10.1177/01650254211005567. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
To provide a comprehensive view of the unique contexts shaping adolescent development in the United States we utilized latent class analysis (LCA) with indicators of risk and protection across multiple domains (family, peers, school, neighborhood) and examined how latent class membership predicted heavy episodic drinking, illicit substance use, and depression in adolescence and six years later when participants were young adults. Data came from wave 1 and wave 3 of the nationally-representative United States-based Add Health study ( = 6,649; W1= 14.06; W3 = 20.38; 53.8% female; 56.1% White/European American; 22.8% Black/African American, 9.5% Hispanic, 6.7% Biracial, Asian or Pacific Islander 4.2%, American Indian/Native American 0.7%;). A 6-class solution was selected with classes named: Two-Parent: Low Risk, Two-Parent: Relationship Risks, Two-Parent: Neighborhood Risks, Single Parent: Low Risk, Single Parent: Relationship Risks, and Single Parent: Multidimensional Risk. Subsequent analyses suggested that adolescent social relationships are particularly important for prevention interventions as the classes marked by substance using peers and a lack of closeness to parents and teachers in adolescence (Two-Parent: Relationship Risks and Single Parent: Relationship Risks) had consistently poorer outcomes in adolescence and young adulthood.
为全面了解影响美国青少年发展的独特背景,我们运用了潜在类别分析(LCA),采用多个领域(家庭、同伴、学校、社区)的风险和保护指标,并考察潜在类别成员身份如何预测青少年期以及六年后(参与者为青年时)的大量饮酒、非法药物使用和抑郁情况。数据来自基于美国的具有全国代表性的“青少年健康纵向研究”的第1波和第3波调查(n = 6649;第1波时平均年龄 = 14.06岁;第3波时平均年龄 = 20.38岁;53.8%为女性;56.1%为白人/欧裔美国人;22.8%为黑人/非裔美国人,9.5%为西班牙裔,6.7%为混血儿,4.2%为亚裔或太平洋岛民,0.7%为美洲印第安人/原住民)。我们选择了一个6类别解决方案,类别分别命名为:双亲:低风险、双亲:关系风险、双亲:社区风险、单亲:低风险、单亲:关系风险、单亲:多维风险。后续分析表明,青少年社会关系对预防干预尤为重要,因为在青少年期以有使用药物的同伴以及与父母和教师关系不亲密为特征的类别(双亲:关系风险和单亲:关系风险)在青少年期和青年期的结果一直较差。