Suppr超能文献

真实世界临床实践中直接口服抗凝剂的安全性:将临床试验转化为日常临床管理。

Safety of direct oral anticoagulants in real-world clinical practice: translating the trials to everyday clinical management.

机构信息

a Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.

b Department of Cardiology, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, National Clinical Research Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases , Capital Medical University , Beijing , China.

出版信息

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019 Mar;18(3):187-209. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2019.1578344. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be regarded as some of the most successful innovations in recent times. These drugs which were specifically developed to overcome the challenges posed by warfarin did just that and in the process, have changed the outlook towards stroke prevention with anticoagulation. The decade of experience with these drugs that has resulted in the availability of large scale data on their safety profile has aided this. Areas covered: This review examines existing real-world studies (RWS) and their interpretation to better appreciate how they either complement or contradict findings from the hallmark trials. Specific focus has been made on the safety of DOACs, on their risks of major bleeding, intra-cranial haemorrhage (ICH), gastro-intestinal (GI) bleeding and all-cause mortality compared to warfarin and each other. DOAC use in the elderly and other sub-groups are briefly discussed. Expert opinion: Results for safety outcomes according to 'real world evidence' (RWE) are in-keeping with randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and currently, all 4 DOACs have been deemed at least as effective as warfarin, while demonstrating superiority in some aspects. While real world studies act as a complementary source of knowledge, traditional RCTs remain the gold standard for determining cause-effect relationships.

摘要

直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)可能被认为是近年来最成功的创新之一。这些药物专门为克服华法林带来的挑战而开发,它们确实做到了这一点,并在抗凝预防中风方面改变了前景。十年来,这些药物的经验积累了大量关于其安全性的大规模数据,这有助于我们了解这些药物。涵盖领域:本综述检查了现有的真实世界研究(RWS)及其解释,以更好地理解它们如何补充或反驳标志性试验的发现。特别关注 DOAC 的安全性、大出血、颅内出血(ICH)、胃肠道(GI)出血和全因死亡率与华法林和彼此之间的风险。简要讨论了 DOAC 在老年人和其他亚组中的应用。专家意见:根据“真实世界证据”(RWE)的安全性结果与随机对照试验(RCT)一致,目前所有 4 种 DOAC 都被认为至少与华法林一样有效,同时在某些方面表现出优越性。虽然真实世界的研究是知识的补充来源,但传统的 RCT 仍然是确定因果关系的金标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验