Galuszynski Nicholas C
Department of Botany, Nelson Mandela University, Gqebehra, South Africa.
PeerJ. 2021 Jun 9;9:e11462. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11462. eCollection 2021.
The global increase in the cultivation of native wild plants has raised concerns regarding potential risks associated with translocating genetic lineages beyond their natural range. This study aimed to investigate whether agricultural cultivation of neo-crops (a) accounts for the levels of genetic diversity present in wild populations, and whether (b) cultivated populations are genetically divergent from wild populations and thus pose a potential threat to wild genetic diversity.
The Cape Floristic Region (CFR), located along the southern Cape of South Africa.
High Resolution Melt analysis (HRM) coupled with Sanger sequencing was used to screen three non-coding chloroplast DNA loci in Vent. (Fabaceae), a CFR endemic neo-crop cultivated for the production of a herbal infusion referred to as Honeybush tea. Wild and cultivated populations for three of three widely cultivated Honeybush species ( and ) were screened. Genetic diversity and differentiation were measured and compared between wild and cultivated groups.
Across all asseccions, a total of 17 haplotypes were detected, four of which were shared between wild and cultivated populations, while the remaining 13 were only detected in wild populations. Genetic diversity and differentiation was significantly higher in wild populations than in cultivated populations.
If no guidelines exist to facilitate the introduction of native wild plant taxa to a cultivated setting, wild genetic diversity patterns are likely to be compromised by cultivated populations. In the case presented here, cultivation represents a genetic bottleneck, failing to account for rare haplotypes, and may have disrupted species boundaries by initiating interspecific hybridization. More empirical work is required to evaluate the extent to which neo-crop cultivation poses a risk to wild genetic resources in the CFR and globally.
全球范围内原生野生植物种植的增加引发了人们对将遗传谱系转移到其自然分布范围之外的潜在风险的担忧。本研究旨在调查新作物的农业种植是否(a)解释了野生种群中存在的遗传多样性水平,以及(b)栽培种群与野生种群在遗传上是否存在差异,从而对野生遗传多样性构成潜在威胁。
位于南非开普敦南部的开普植物区(CFR)。
采用高分辨率熔解分析(HRM)结合桑格测序,对 Vent.(豆科)的三个非编码叶绿体DNA位点进行筛选,Vent.是一种在CFR地区特有的新作物,用于生产一种名为蜜 bush 茶的草药浸剂。对三种广泛种植的蜜 bush 物种( 和 )的野生和栽培种群进行了筛选。测量并比较了野生和栽培群体之间的遗传多样性和分化情况。
在所有样本中,共检测到17种单倍型,其中4种在野生和栽培种群中共享,其余13种仅在野生种群中检测到。野生种群的遗传多样性和分化程度显著高于栽培种群。
如果不存在促进将原生野生植物分类群引入栽培环境的指导方针,野生遗传多样性模式可能会受到栽培种群的影响。在本文所述的案例中,种植代表了一个遗传瓶颈,无法解释罕见的单倍型,并且可能通过启动种间杂交破坏了物种界限。需要更多的实证研究来评估新作物种植对CFR地区和全球野生遗传资源构成风险的程度。