Departments of Health Metrics Sciences and Global Health, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle.
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2114730. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14730.
Based on mortality estimates for 32 causes of death that are amenable to health care, the US health care system did not perform as well as other high-income countries, scoring 88.7 out of 100 on the 2016 age-standardized Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) index.
To compare US age-specific HAQ scores with those of high-income countries with universal health insurance coverage and compare scores among US states with varying insurance coverage.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used 2016 Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factor study results for cause-specific mortality with adjustments for behavioral and environmental risks to estimate the age-specific HAQ indices. The US national age-specific HAQ scores were compared with high-income peers (Canada, western Europe, high-income Asia Pacific countries, and Australasia) in 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2016, and the 2016 scores among US states were also analyzed. The Public Use Microdata Sample of the American Community Survey was used to estimate insurance coverage and the median income per person by age and state. Age-specific HAQ scores for each state in 2010 and 2016 were regressed based on models with age fixed effects and age interaction with insurance coverage, median income, and year. Data were analyzed from April to July 2018 and July to September 2020.
The age-specific HAQ indices were the outcome measures.
In 1990, US age-specific HAQ scores were similar to peers but increased less from 1990 to 2016 than peer locations for ages 15 years or older. For example, for ages 50 to 54 years, US scores increased from 77.1 to 82.1 while high-income Asia Pacific scores increased from 71.6 to 88.2. In 2016, several states had scores comparable with peers, with large differences in performance across states. For ages 15 years or older, the age-specific HAQ scores were 85 or greater for all ages in 3 states (Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Minnesota) and 75 or less for at least 1 age category in 6 states. In regression analysis estimates with state-fixed effects, insurance coverage coefficients for ages 20 to 24 years were 0.059 (99% CI, 0.006-0.111); 45 to 49 years, 0.088 (99% CI, 0.009-0.167); and 50 to 54 years, 0.101 (99% CI, 0.013-0.189). A 10% increase in insurance coverage was associated with point increases in HAQ scores among the ages of 20 to 24 years (0.59 [99% CI, 0.06-1.11]), 45 to 49 years (0.88 [99% CI, 0.09-1.67]), and 50 to 54 years (1.01 [99% CI, 0.13-1.89]).
In this cross-sectional study, the US age-specific HAQ scores for ages 15 to 64 years were low relative to high-income peer locations with universal health insurance coverage. Among US states, insurance coverage was associated with higher HAQ scores for some ages. Further research with causal models and additional explanations is warranted.
根据对 32 种可通过医疗保健改善的死因的死亡率估计,美国的医疗保健系统表现不如其他高收入国家,在 2016 年按年龄标准化的医疗保健获取和质量 (HAQ) 指数中得分为 88.7 分。
将美国特定年龄的 HAQ 得分与具有全民医疗保险覆盖的高收入国家进行比较,并比较美国各州不同保险覆盖范围的得分。
设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面研究使用了 2016 年全球疾病、伤害和风险因素研究结果,对特定病因死亡率进行了调整,以估计特定年龄的 HAQ 指数。美国全国特定年龄的 HAQ 得分与高收入同龄人(加拿大、西欧、高收入亚太国家和澳大拉西亚)在 1990 年、2000 年、2010 年和 2016 年进行了比较,并分析了 2016 年美国各州的得分。使用美国社区调查的公共使用微观数据样本,按年龄和州估计了保险覆盖范围和每人的中位数收入。根据包含年龄固定效应和年龄与保险覆盖范围、中位数收入和年份的交互项的模型,回归了每个州在 2010 年和 2016 年的特定年龄的 HAQ 得分。数据于 2018 年 4 月至 7 月和 2020 年 7 月至 9 月进行了分析。
特定年龄的 HAQ 指数是结果衡量标准。
在 1990 年,美国特定年龄的 HAQ 得分与同龄人相似,但与年龄在 15 岁及以上的同龄人相比,从 1990 年到 2016 年的增长幅度较小。例如,对于 50 至 54 岁的人群,美国的得分从 77.1 上升到 82.1,而高收入亚太地区的得分从 71.6 上升到 88.2。在 2016 年,一些州的得分与同龄人相当,各州之间的表现存在很大差异。对于 15 岁及以上的人群,3 个州(康涅狄格州、马萨诸塞州和明尼苏达州)的所有年龄段的特定年龄的 HAQ 得分均为 85 或更高,而 6 个州至少有 1 个年龄段的得分低于 75。在具有州固定效应的回归分析估计中,20 至 24 岁年龄组的保险覆盖系数为 0.059(99%置信区间,0.006-0.111);45 至 49 岁年龄组为 0.088(99%置信区间,0.009-0.167);50 至 54 岁年龄组为 0.101(99%置信区间,0.013-0.189)。保险覆盖范围增加 10%与 20 至 24 岁(0.59 [99%置信区间,0.06-1.11])、45 至 49 岁(0.88 [99%置信区间,0.09-1.67])和 50 至 54 岁(1.01 [99%置信区间,0.13-1.89])年龄组的 HAQ 得分增加有关。
在这项横断面研究中,美国 15 至 64 岁人群的特定年龄 HAQ 得分相对具有全民医疗保险覆盖的高收入同龄人较低。在美国各州中,保险覆盖范围与某些年龄的 HAQ 得分较高有关。需要进行因果模型和其他解释的进一步研究。