Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Dec;10(12):e1715-e1743. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00429-6. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
Health-care needs change throughout the life course. It is thus crucial to assess whether health systems provide access to quality health care for all ages. Drawing from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2019 (GBD 2019), we measured the Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) Index overall and for select age groups in 204 locations from 1990 to 2019.
We distinguished the overall HAQ Index (ages 0-74 years) from scores for select age groups: the young (ages 0-14 years), working (ages 15-64 years), and post-working (ages 65-74 years) groups. For GBD 2019, HAQ Index construction methods were updated to use the arithmetic mean of scaled mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs) and risk-standardised death rates (RSDRs) for 32 causes of death that should not occur in the presence of timely, quality health care. Across locations and years, MIRs and RSDRs were scaled from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) separately, putting the HAQ Index on a different relative scale for each age group. We estimated absolute convergence for each group on the basis of whether the HAQ Index grew faster in absolute terms between 1990 and 2019 in countries with lower 1990 HAQ Index scores than countries with higher 1990 HAQ Index scores and by Socio-demographic Index (SDI) quintile. SDI is a summary metric of overall development.
Between 1990 and 2019, the HAQ Index increased overall (by 19·6 points, 95% uncertainty interval 17·9-21·3), as well as among the young (22·5, 19·9-24·7), working (17·2, 15·2-19·1), and post-working (15·1, 13·2-17·0) age groups. Large differences in HAQ Index scores were present across SDI levels in 2019, with the overall index ranging from 30·7 (28·6-33·0) on average in low-SDI countries to 83·4 (82·4-84·3) on average in high-SDI countries. Similarly large ranges between low-SDI and high-SDI countries, respectively, were estimated in the HAQ Index for the young (40·4-89·0), working (33·8-82·8), and post-working (30·4-79·1) groups. Absolute convergence in HAQ Index was estimated in the young group only. In contrast, divergence was estimated among the working and post-working groups, driven by slow progress in low-SDI countries.
Although major gaps remain across levels of social and economic development, convergence in the young group is an encouraging sign of reduced disparities in health-care access and quality. However, divergence in the working and post-working groups indicates that health-care access and quality is lagging at lower levels of social and economic development. To meet the needs of ageing populations, health systems need to improve health-care access and quality for working-age adults and older populations while continuing to realise gains among the young.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
医疗保健需求在整个生命过程中发生变化。因此,评估卫生系统是否为所有年龄段的人提供高质量的医疗保健至关重要。本研究利用全球疾病、伤害和风险因素研究 2019 年(GBD 2019 年)的数据,测量了 204 个地点在 1990 年至 2019 年期间的整体医疗保健可及性和质量(HAQ)指数以及特定年龄段的分数。
我们将整体 HAQ 指数(0-74 岁)与特定年龄组的分数区分开来:青年组(0-14 岁)、劳动年龄组(15-64 岁)和退休后年龄组(65-74 岁)。对于 GBD 2019 年,HAQ 指数的构建方法进行了更新,使用了 32 种死因的比例死亡率与发病率比值(MIR)和风险标准化死亡率(RSDR)的算术平均值,这些死因在及时、高质量的医疗保健条件下不应发生。在不同的地点和年份,MIR 和 RSDR 分别从 0(最差)到 100(最好)进行缩放,从而使 HAQ 指数在每个年龄组中处于不同的相对比例。我们根据各国在 1990 年的 HAQ 指数得分较低的情况下,HAQ 指数在绝对值上的增长速度是否快于得分较高的国家,以及按社会发展指数(SDI)五分位数进行了绝对收敛的估计。SDI 是总体发展的综合指标。
1990 年至 2019 年期间,HAQ 指数整体(增加 19.6 分,95%置信区间为 17.9-21.3)以及青年组(22.5,19.9-24.7)、劳动年龄组(17.2,15.2-19.1)和退休后年龄组(15.1,13.2-17.0)均有所增加。2019 年,SDI 水平之间的 HAQ 指数得分差异很大,低 SDI 国家的平均指数为 30.7(28.6-33.0),高 SDI 国家的平均指数为 83.4(82.4-84.3)。同样,青年组(40.4-89.0)、劳动年龄组(33.8-82.8)和退休后年龄组(30.4-79.1)的 HAQ 指数在低 SDI 和高 SDI 国家之间也存在较大差异。仅在青年组中估计了 HAQ 指数的绝对收敛。相比之下,在劳动年龄组和退休后年龄组中则估计了发散,这是由低 SDI 国家进展缓慢所致。
尽管社会和经济发展水平之间仍存在重大差距,但青年组的收敛是医疗保健可及性和质量差距缩小的令人鼓舞的迹象。然而,劳动年龄组和退休后年龄组的发散表明,在较低的社会和经济发展水平上,医疗保健的可及性和质量正在滞后。为了满足人口老龄化的需求,卫生系统需要在劳动年龄成年人和老年人口中改善医疗保健的可及性和质量,同时继续在青年中取得进展。
比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会。