Fordham University.
AJOB Neurosci. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):245-256. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2021.1939460. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
For more than 20 years, Western science education has been incorporated into Tibetan Buddhist monastics' training. In this time, there have been a number of fruitful collaborations between Buddhist monastics and neuroscientists, neurologists, and psychologists. These collaborations are unsurprising given the emphasis on phenomenological exploration of first-person conscious experience in Buddhist contemplative practice and the focus on the mind and consciousness in Buddhist theory. As such, Tibetan monastics may have underappreciated intuitions on the intersection of science, medicine, and ethics. Yet despite their overlapping interests, Buddhist perspectives are largely absent in contemporary neuroethical analysis, apart from conceptual arguments for their relevance. This article attempts to fill this gap by presenting the results of eleven semi-structured interviews with Tibetan Buddhist monastics in India on three issues in neuroethics: identity and authenticity, enhancement, and disorders of consciousness. The results of this empirical study reinforce the conclusions of theoretical work on Buddhism and neuroethics while also identifying future areas of inquiry, including the importance of community, the challenges in acting from compassion, and the value of self-directed mental cultivation.
二十多年来,西方科学教育已经融入了藏传佛教僧侣的训练中。在这段时间里,佛教僧侣与神经科学家、神经学家和心理学家之间进行了许多富有成效的合作。鉴于佛教冥想实践中对第一人称意识经验的现象学探索以及对心灵和意识的关注在佛教理论中的重要性,这种合作并不令人意外。因此,藏传佛教僧侣可能对科学、医学和伦理学的交叉点有一些未被充分认识的直觉。尽管他们的利益重叠,但除了对相关性的概念论证外,佛教观点在当代神经伦理学分析中基本上是缺失的。本文试图通过介绍对印度的 11 位藏传佛教僧侣进行的关于神经伦理学三个问题的 11 次半结构化访谈的结果来填补这一空白:身份和真实性、增强和意识障碍。这项实证研究的结果不仅证实了关于佛教和神经伦理学的理论工作的结论,同时还确定了未来的研究领域,包括社区的重要性、从同情心出发的挑战以及自我导向的精神培养的价值。