Suppr超能文献

根据临床相关性对非阿司匹林非甾体抗炎药进行重新分类:摒弃传统的非甾体抗炎药术语

Recategorization of Non-Aspirin Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs According to Clinical Relevance: Abandoning the Traditional NSAID Terminology.

作者信息

Bonnesen Kasper, Schmidt Morten

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2021 Nov;37(11):1705-1707. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.06.014. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

Abstract

Non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently used to treat pain, fever, and inflammation. Historically, NSAIDs have been categorized as traditional NSAIDs and newer cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors (coxibs). However, traditional NSAIDs also inhibit the COX-1 and COX-2 enzyme isoforms to a varying degree. This diversity of COX-1 and COX-2 selectivity within the class of traditional NSAIDs has proven clinically important, with evidence accumulating on the cardiovascular risks associated with selective COX-2 inhibition. Thus, the relative COX-2 selectivity of traditional NSAIDs correlates with their cardiovascular risk profile, being more favourable for non-selective NSAIDs, such as naproxen and low-dose ibuprofen, and less favourable for more COX-2 selective agents, such as diclofenac. To enhance clinically relevant terminology, we advocate categorizing all non-aspirin NSAIDs-including traditional NSAIDs-according to their relative COX-1 and COX-2 selectivity as either COX-1 inhibitors, non-selective NSAIDs, or COX-2 inhibitors. We further recommend subcategorizing COX-2 inhibitors as newer COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) or older COX-2 inhibitors. Finally, we recommend examining the effects of the individual NSAIDs included in each of the proposed categories. Adhering to these recommendations will align future studies, advance interpretation of COX-specific adverse cardiovascular effects, and provide better guidance to clinicians prescribing NSAIDs.

摘要

非阿司匹林类非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)常用于治疗疼痛、发热和炎症。历史上,NSAIDs被分为传统NSAIDs和新型环氧化酶(COX)-2抑制剂(昔布类)。然而,传统NSAIDs也会不同程度地抑制COX-1和COX-2同工酶。传统NSAIDs类药物中COX-1和COX-2选择性的这种差异已被证明具有临床重要性,越来越多的证据表明选择性COX-2抑制与心血管风险相关。因此,传统NSAIDs的相对COX-2选择性与其心血管风险特征相关,对于非选择性NSAIDs(如萘普生和低剂量布洛芬)更为有利,而对于COX-2选择性更强的药物(如双氯芬酸)则不太有利。为了增强临床相关术语,我们主张根据所有非阿司匹林类NSAIDs(包括传统NSAIDs)的相对COX-1和COX-2选择性,将其分类为COX-1抑制剂、非选择性NSAIDs或COX-2抑制剂。我们还建议将COX-2抑制剂进一步细分为新型COX-2抑制剂(昔布类)或旧型COX-2抑制剂。最后,我们建议研究每个提议类别中所含个别NSAIDs的作用。遵循这些建议将使未来的研究保持一致,推进对COX特异性不良心血管效应的解释,并为开具NSAIDs处方的临床医生提供更好的指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验