Suppr超能文献

系统评价和荟萃分析:初学者指南。

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Beginners.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, PGIMER, Chandigarh. Correspondence to: Prof Joseph L Mathew, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, PGIMER Chandigarh.

出版信息

Indian Pediatr. 2022 Apr 15;59(4):320-330. doi: 10.1007/s13312-022-2500-y. Epub 2021 Jun 28.

Abstract

Systematic reviews involve the application of scientific methods to reduce bias in review of literature. The key components of a systematic review are a well-defined research question, comprehensive literature search to identify all studies that potentially address the question, systematic assembly of the studies that answer the question, critical appraisal of the methodological quality of the included studies, data extraction and analysis (with and without statistics), and considerations towards applicability of the evidence generated in a systematic review. These key features can be remembered as six 'A'; Ask, Access, Assimilate, Appraise, Analyze and Apply. Meta-analysis is a statistical tool that provides pooled estimates of effect from the data extracted from individual studies in the systematic review. The graphical output of meta-analysis is a forest plot which provides information on individual studies and the pooled effect. Systematic reviews of literature can be undertaken for all types of questions, and all types of study designs. This article highlights the key features of systematic reviews, and is designed to help readers understand and interpret them. It can also help to serve as a beginner's guide for both users and producers of systematic reviews and to appreciate some of the methodological issues.

摘要

系统评价涉及应用科学方法来减少文献综述中的偏倚。系统评价的关键组成部分是一个明确界定的研究问题、全面的文献搜索以确定所有可能回答该问题的研究、系统地收集回答该问题的研究、对纳入研究的方法学质量进行批判性评估、数据提取和分析(有和没有统计学),以及考虑系统评价中生成的证据的适用性。这些关键特征可以用六个“ A”来记住:提问、获取、吸收、评估、分析和应用。Meta 分析是一种统计工具,可从系统评价中提取的个体研究数据中得出效应的汇总估计。Meta 分析的图形输出是森林图,它提供了有关个体研究和汇总效应的信息。文献系统评价可用于所有类型的问题和所有类型的研究设计。本文重点介绍了系统评价的关键特征,旨在帮助读者理解和解释它们。它也可以帮助系统评价的使用者和生产者以及一些方法学问题的欣赏者作为初学者的指南。

相似文献

1
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Beginners.系统评价和荟萃分析:初学者指南。
Indian Pediatr. 2022 Apr 15;59(4):320-330. doi: 10.1007/s13312-022-2500-y. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

7
The trend of publications in the : A 6-year systematic survey of the journal.该期刊的出版趋势:对该期刊的6年系统调查
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Feb;28(2):126-131. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_809_24. Epub 2025 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

5
Publication Bias: The Elephant in the Review.发表偏倚:综述中被忽视的重大问题
Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):812-3. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001596.
6
SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies.SYRCLE 动物研究偏倚风险评估工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 26;14:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-43.
7
Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis.超越 PICO:用于定性证据综合的 SPIDER 工具。
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43. doi: 10.1177/1049732312452938. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验