Biomedical Research Center of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Virology, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 05, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Sep;203(7):4737-4742. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02458-5. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) offers a unique opportunity to analyze ongoing bacterial infections qualitatively and quantitatively in intact animals over time, leading to a reduction in the number of animals needed for a study. Since accurate determination of the bacterial burden plays an essential role in microbiological research, the present study aimed to evaluate the ability to quantify bacteria by non-invasive BLI technique in comparison to standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). For this purpose, BALB/c mice were intranasally infected with 1 × 10 CFU of bioluminescent Streptococcus pneumoniae A66.1. At day 1 post-infection, the presence of S. pneumoniae in lungs was demonstrated by spread plate method and RT-qPCR, but not by in vivo BLI. However, on the second day p.i., the bioluminescent signal was already detectable, and the photon flux values positively correlated with CFU counts and RT-qPCR data within days 2-6. Though in vivo BLI is valuable research tool allowing the continuous monitoring and quantification of pneumococcal infection in living mice, it should be kept in mind that early in the infection, depending on the infective dose, the bioluminescent signal may be below the detection limit.
体内生物发光成像(BLI)为在完整动物中随时间定性和定量分析持续细菌感染提供了独特的机会,从而减少了研究所需的动物数量。由于准确确定细菌负荷在微生物研究中起着至关重要的作用,本研究旨在评估通过非侵入性 BLI 技术定量细菌的能力,与标准平板扩散法和逆转录定量 PCR(RT-qPCR)进行比较。为此,BALB/c 小鼠通过鼻腔感染 1×10 CFU 生物发光性肺炎链球菌 A66.1。在感染后第 1 天,通过平板扩散法和 RT-qPCR 证明了肺部存在肺炎链球菌,但通过体内 BLI 则无法证明。然而,在感染后第 2 天,即可检测到生物发光信号,并且在第 2-6 天内,光量子通量值与 CFU 计数和 RT-qPCR 数据呈正相关。尽管体内 BLI 是一种有价值的研究工具,允许对活体小鼠中的肺炎链球菌感染进行连续监测和定量,但应注意的是,在感染早期,取决于感染剂量,生物发光信号可能低于检测限。