Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Department of Orthopedics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Sports Health. 2022 Mar-Apr;14(2):197-204. doi: 10.1177/19417381211025307. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
Return to sport is widely utilized by sports medicine researchers and clinicians as a primary outcome of interest for successful recovery when working with young patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While return-to-sport outcomes are effective at tracking progress post-ACLR, they are limited because they do not necessarily capture physical activity (PA) engagement, which is important to maintain knee joint health and reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases. Therefore, there is a critical need (1) to describe current PA participation and measurement recommendations; (2) to appraise common PA measurement approaches, including patient-reported outcomes and device-based methodologies; and (3) to provide clinical recommendations for future evaluation.
Reports of patient-reported or device-based PA in patients with ACL injury were acquired and summarized based on a PubMed search (2000 through July 2020). Search terms included OR AND OR .
Clinical review.
Level 5.
We highlight that (1) individuals with ACLR are 2.36 times less likely to meet the US Department of Health and Human Services PA recommendations even when reporting successful return to sport, (2) common patient-reported PA assessments have significant limitations in the data that can be derived, and (3) alternative patient-reported and device-based assessments may provide improved assessment of PA in this patient population.
Clinicians and researchers have relied on return to sport status or self-reported PA participation via surveys. These approaches are not consistent with current recommendations for PA assessment and do not allow for comparison with contemporary PA recommendations or guidelines. Return to sport, patient-reported outcome measures, and device-based assessment approaches should be used in complementary manners to comprehensively assess PA participation after ACLR. However, appropriate techniques should be used when assessing PA in adult and adolescent populations.
在对接受前交叉韧带(ACL)重建(ACLR)的年轻患者进行成功康复的研究中,运动医学研究人员和临床医生广泛将重返运动作为主要的关注结果。虽然重返运动的结果在 ACLR 后跟踪进展是有效的,但它们存在局限性,因为它们不一定能捕捉到身体活动(PA)的参与,而这对于保持膝关节健康和降低非传染性疾病的风险很重要。因此,有一个迫切的需求:(1)描述当前的 PA 参与和测量建议;(2)评估常见的 PA 测量方法,包括患者报告的结果和基于设备的方法;(3)为未来的评估提供临床建议。
根据 PubMed 搜索(2000 年至 2020 年 7 月)获取并总结了 ACL 损伤患者的患者报告或基于设备的 PA 报告。搜索词包括或、和、或。
临床综述。
5 级。
我们强调:(1)即使报告成功重返运动,接受 ACLR 的个体满足美国卫生与公众服务部 PA 建议的可能性也低 2.36 倍;(2)常见的患者报告 PA 评估在可得出的数据方面存在重大局限性;(3)替代的患者报告和基于设备的评估可能为该患者群体的 PA 提供更好的评估。
临床医生和研究人员依赖于重返运动状态或通过调查报告的 PA 参与。这些方法与当前的 PA 评估建议不一致,并且不允许与当代 PA 建议或指南进行比较。重返运动、患者报告的结果测量和基于设备的评估方法应相辅相成,以全面评估 ACLR 后的 PA 参与。但是,在评估成年人和青少年人群的 PA 时,应使用适当的技术。