Biopolymers and Colloids Laboratory, Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Biopolymers and Colloids Laboratory, Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA; Department of Food Science & Bioengineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, 18 Xuezheng Street, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Food Chem. 2021 Dec 1;364:130439. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130439. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
Plant-based meat analogs are likely to have different gastrointestinal fates than real meat products due to differences in their compositions and structures. Here, we compared the gastrointestinal fate of ground beef and ground beef analogs using the INFOGEST in vitro digestion model, focusing on differences in microstructure, physicochemical properties, lipid digestion, and protein digestion in different regions of the model gut. The presence of dietary fibers in the beef analogs increased their apparent shear viscosity in the gastrointestinal fluids, which may have inhibited lipid digestion in the small intestine. The proteins in the beef analogs were digested more rapidly in the stomach but less rapidly in the small intestine, which may have been due to differences in protein type (globular soy versus fibrous beef proteins), structural organization, and the presence of dietary fibers in the meat analogs.
由于植物基肉模拟物的组成和结构与真正的肉类产品不同,因此它们在胃肠道中的命运可能也有所不同。在这里,我们使用 INFOGEST 体外消化模型比较了碎牛肉和碎牛肉模拟物的胃肠道命运,重点关注模型肠道不同区域微观结构、理化性质、脂质消化和蛋白质消化的差异。牛肉模拟物中膳食纤维的存在增加了它们在胃肠道流体中的表观剪切粘度,这可能抑制了小肠中的脂质消化。牛肉模拟物中的蛋白质在胃中消化得更快,但在小肠中消化得更慢,这可能是由于蛋白质类型(球状大豆与纤维状牛肉蛋白)、结构组织以及肉模拟物中膳食纤维的存在不同所致。