Suppr超能文献

对比素食汉堡和肉食汉堡在烤制前后的体外消化率和 DIAAR。

Comparison of in vitro digestibility and DIAAR between vegan and meat burgers before and after grilling.

机构信息

Agroscope, Schwarzenburgstrasse, 161, 3003 Bern, Switzerland; Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL, CSIC-UAM), Madrid, Spain.

Agroscope, Schwarzenburgstrasse, 161, 3003 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Food Res Int. 2023 Apr;166:112569. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112569. Epub 2023 Feb 4.

Abstract

Plant-based meat alternatives of high quality and digestibility could be a way to reduce meat consumption and, consequently, the environmental impact. However, little is known about their nutritional characteristics and digestion behaviour. Therefore, in the present study, the protein quality of beef burgers, known as excellent source of protein, was compared with the protein quality of two highly transformed veggie burgers, based on soy or pea-faba proteins, respectively. The different burgers were digested according to the INFOGEST in vitro digestion protocol. After digestion, total protein digestibility was determined, either based on total nitrogen (Kjeldahl) analysis, or after acid hydrolysis based on total amino groups (o-phthalaldehyde method) or total amino acids (TAA; by HPLC). The digestibility of individual amino acids was also determined, and the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) was calculated based on in vitro digestibility. The impact of texturising and grilling on in vitro protein digestibility and the digestible indispensable amino acid ratio (DIAAR) was evaluated at the level of the ingredients and the finished products. As expected, the grilled beef burger had the highest in vitro DIAAS values (Leu 124 %), and grilled soy protein-based burger reached in vitro DIAAS values that could be rated as good (soy burger, SAA 94 %) protein source, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization. The texturing process did not significantly affect the total protein digestibility of the ingredients. However, grilling led to a decrease in digestibility and DIAAR of the pea-faba burger (P < 0.05), which was not observed in the soy burger, but led to an increase in DIAAR in the beef burger (P < 0.005).

摘要

高质量和易消化的植物性肉类替代品可能是减少肉类消费从而减少环境影响的一种方法。然而,关于它们的营养特性和消化行为知之甚少。因此,在本研究中,牛肉汉堡的蛋白质质量(被认为是蛋白质的极好来源)与两种高度转化的蔬菜汉堡的蛋白质质量进行了比较,这两种蔬菜汉堡分别基于大豆或豌豆-豆科植物蛋白。根据 INFOGEST 体外消化方案对不同的汉堡进行消化。消化后,通过凯氏定氮法(Kjeldahl)分析总氮或通过酸水解基于总氨基酸基团(邻苯二醛法)或总氨基酸(TAA;通过 HPLC)测定总蛋白质消化率。还测定了个别氨基酸的消化率,并根据体外消化率计算了可消化必需氨基酸评分(DIAAS)。在成分和成品水平上评估了质地处理和烧烤对体外蛋白质消化率和可消化必需氨基酸比(DIAAR)的影响。正如预期的那样,烧烤牛肉汉堡的体外 DIAAS 值最高(亮氨酸 124%),而烧烤大豆蛋白基汉堡的体外 DIAAS 值可被评为良好(大豆汉堡,SAA 94%)的蛋白质来源,根据联合国粮食及农业组织的说法。质地处理过程不会显著影响成分的总蛋白质消化率。然而,烧烤导致豌豆-豆科植物汉堡的消化率和 DIAAR 降低(P<0.05),而在大豆汉堡中没有观察到这种情况,但导致牛肉汉堡的 DIAAR 增加(P<0.005)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验