Suppr超能文献

在膝关节镜检查中应用的“馅饼皮”技术中,内侧副韧带(MCL)的哪些纤维应该被松解:浅层MCL还是深层MCL?

Which Fibers of the Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL) Should Be Released in the Pie Crust Technique Applied During Knee Arthroscopy: Superficial MCL or Deep MCL?

作者信息

Arıcan Gökhun, Ercan Niyazi, Elçi Melih, Şahin Özgür, Alemdaroğlu Bahadır

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Yuksek Ihtısas University, Medical Park Ankara Hospital, Ankara, TUR.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Dec 22;13(12):e20597. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20597. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Background Knee arthroscopy is the most common surgery performed to treat meniscal injuries. The pie crust (PC) technique is applied during knee arthroscopy to increase joint vision of the medial femorotibial compartment and reduce the risk of iatrogenic damage. Medial collateral ligament (MCL) release is applied in the PC technique. Currently, there are no studies directly comparing the release of the superficial MCL (sMCL) or deep MCL (dMCL) when applied during the PC technique. In this study, we compared the clinical and functional results of the release of the deep and proximal tibial attachment of the superficial fibers of the MCL. Methodology We evaluated the results of 67 (27 women and 40 men) patients who underwent the PC technique during knee arthroscopy due to a medial meniscal tear. The patients who underwent the PC technique were divided into two groups according to the release of the deep and superficial fibers of the MCL. All patients were evaluated for pain, functional capacity, and laxity using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Oxford Knee scores. All patients were evaluated with radiographic examinations such as valgus laxity angle and medial tibiofemoral compartment opening height. Results The KOOS and Oxford Knee Scores in both groups showed a statistically significant increase at 12 months postoperatively compared with the preoperative values (p = 0.005, 0.002, 0.002, and 0.01, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p > 0.05). When the valgus laxity angle before the PC technique was compared with the 12-month result after the procedure, no statistically significant difference was noted (p > 0.05). There was no evidence of complications such as chondral injury and saphenous nerve or vein injury among patients in either group. Conclusions In this study, we did not observe laxity in the long-term follow-up of the groups in which the superficial or deep fibers of the MCL were released. In our view, the PC technique has similar effects on surgical outcomes regardless of sMCL and dMCL release techniques.

摘要

背景 膝关节镜检查是治疗半月板损伤最常见的手术。在膝关节镜检查过程中应用“派皮”(PC)技术以增加股骨内侧髁间室的关节视野并降低医源性损伤风险。内侧副韧带(MCL)松解术应用于PC技术中。目前,尚无研究直接比较PC技术中应用浅层MCL(sMCL)或深层MCL(dMCL)松解术的情况。在本研究中,我们比较了MCL浅层纤维深层及近端胫骨附着点松解术的临床和功能结果。

方法 我们评估了67例(27例女性和40例男性)因内侧半月板撕裂在膝关节镜检查时接受PC技术的患者的结果。接受PC技术的患者根据MCL浅层和深层纤维的松解情况分为两组。使用膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)和牛津膝关节评分对所有患者的疼痛、功能能力和松弛度进行评估。所有患者均通过诸如外翻松弛角和内侧胫股关节间隙开口高度等影像学检查进行评估。

结果 两组的KOOS和牛津膝关节评分在术后12个月时与术前值相比均有统计学显著提高(分别为p = 0.005、0.002、0.002和0.01)。两组之间未发现统计学显著差异(p > 0.05)。将PC技术前的外翻松弛角与术后12个月的结果进行比较时,未发现统计学显著差异(p > 0.05)。两组患者中均未出现软骨损伤、隐神经或静脉损伤等并发症的证据。

结论 在本研究中,我们在对MCL浅层或深层纤维进行松解的组的长期随访中未观察到松弛情况。我们认为,无论sMCL和dMCL松解技术如何,PC技术对手术结果具有相似的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/340c/8778637/7c986718bbc1/cureus-0013-00000020597-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验