Rogan Slavko, Taeymans Jan, Zuber Stefan, Zinzen Evert
Bern University of Applied Sciences, Department of Health Professions, Division of Physiotherapy, Bern, Switzerland.
Academy for integrative physiotherapy and training education, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 29;21(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02794-6.
Guided self-study (G-SS) can be used as a self-directed learning method or self-determined learning that fosters changes in knowledge and skills in a higher physiotherapy education setting. Until now, there has been no empirical evidence for the use of G-SS in higher physiotherapy education. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility to establish a G-SS program in a fulltime undergraduate physiotherapy degree course. In addition, the effectiveness of the G-SS was assessed on changes in knowledge and skills.
Fifty-one first-semester physiotherapy students were randomly divided into a G-SS group or control group (CG). The G-SS group received six clinical cases. Each case was processed in an eight-day cycle. One week in advance, the clinical case were provided to the students electronically (day 1). The students prepared the cases in groups and were guided by the tutor during this preparation time (day 2 to 7). Group work results were presented and reflected on during a moderated plenum session at day 8. A priori criteria of success were defined based on empirical experience for the primary outcome parameters i) exposure, ii) responsiveness of students and iii) program differentiation. The secondary outcome was the total score in the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and written exams. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS.
The responsiveness of students as willing to participate in the G-SS program was 23%, clearly below the a priori set 83%. No differences in program differentiation were found. G-SS as compared to the CG scored significantly better on OSCE (p = 0.003) and on the written exam (p = 0.004).
The results showed that this higher education G-SS program in its current form was not feasible. Slight modification of the study protocol (e.g. better time planning in the academic calendar) is needed to improve the student's responsiveness. The adjustments to the timetable must allow the physiotherapy students to prepare the clinical cases under conditions of lower workload. G-SS has the potential to promote change in knowledge and skills in undergraduate physiotherapy students when students prepare and present the clinical case solutions and reflect upon their actions.
Registry of Efficacy and Effectiveness Studies, Registry ID: # 1726.1 Registered on February 26th, 2019.
引导式自学(G-SS)可作为一种自主学习方法或自主决定的学习方式,在高等物理治疗教育环境中促进知识和技能的改变。到目前为止,尚无关于在高等物理治疗教育中使用G-SS的实证证据。本研究旨在探讨在全日制本科物理治疗学位课程中建立G-SS项目的可行性。此外,还评估了G-SS对知识和技能变化的有效性。
51名第一学期的物理治疗专业学生被随机分为G-SS组或对照组(CG)。G-SS组收到6个临床病例。每个病例按8天周期进行处理。提前一周,将临床病例以电子方式提供给学生(第1天)。学生分组准备病例,并在准备期间由导师指导(第2天至第7天)。在第8天的一次有主持人的全会上展示并反思小组作业结果。根据主要结果参数(i)接触程度、(ii)学生的反应能力和(iii)项目差异的经验,定义了成功的先验标准。次要结果是客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)和笔试的总分。使用SPSS进行统计分析。
学生愿意参与G-SS项目的反应率为23%,明显低于预先设定的83%。未发现项目差异。与CG组相比,G-SS组在OSCE(p = 0.003)和笔试(p = 0.004)中得分显著更高。
结果表明,目前形式的这种高等教育G-SS项目不可行。需要对研究方案进行轻微修改(例如在学术日历中更好地规划时间)以提高学生的反应率。对时间表的调整必须使物理治疗专业学生能够在工作量较低的情况下准备临床病例。当学生准备并展示临床病例解决方案并反思自己的行动时,G-SS有潜力促进本科物理治疗专业学生知识和技能的改变。
疗效与有效性研究注册库,注册编号:# 1726.1,于2019年2月26日注册。