Newble D I, Entwistle N J
Med Educ. 1986 May;20(3):162-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01163.x.
This paper reviews the recent literature on learning styles and approaches to learning. It identifies two separate streams of research, one originating from mainstream cognitive and psychometric psychology and one from research undertaken within the everyday learning environment. The latter is dealt with in greater detail as it seems to have more immediate practical relevance. A simple model of the teaching-learning process is presented showing how students learn in different ways which are partly attributable to their preferred learning style and partly to the context in which the learning takes place. Three basic approaches have been identified: surface, deep and strategic, each resulting in a different learning outcome. The most desirable and successful is the deep approach. The way in which the teaching and the policies of the department and school influence the students' approach to learning are reviewed in some detail. A consideration of these characteristics in medical schools suggested that many may hinder rather than assist in the development of the desired approach. The work reviewed here suggests that the remedy will require not only substantial changes in the teaching, curriculum and, particularly, assessment, but also a new strategy based on identifying and assisting individual students whose approaches to study are not those expected of a competent university-educated doctor.
本文回顾了近期关于学习风格和学习方法的文献。它确定了两个不同的研究方向,一个源自主流认知心理学和心理测量学,另一个源自日常学习环境中的研究。后者将得到更详细的论述,因为它似乎具有更直接的实际意义。文中提出了一个简单的教学过程模型,展示了学生如何以不同方式学习,这部分归因于他们偏爱的学习风格,部分归因于学习发生的情境。已确定三种基本方法:表层、深层和策略性方法,每种方法都会产生不同的学习结果。最理想且最成功的是深层方法。文中较为详细地探讨了教学以及院系政策如何影响学生的学习方法。对医学院校这些特点的考量表明,许多特点可能会阻碍而非有助于培养理想的学习方法。此处回顾的研究表明,补救措施不仅需要在教学、课程尤其是评估方面进行重大变革,还需要一种基于识别和帮助那些学习方法不符合合格大学学历医生预期的个体学生的新策略。