比较心理社会治疗对儿童和青少年破坏性行为障碍的疗效和可接受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析的研究方案。
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial treatments for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and adolescents: study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
机构信息
School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.
School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China
出版信息
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(6):e046091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046091.
INTRODUCTION
Disruptive behaviour disorders are common among children and adolescents, with negative impacts on the youths, their families and society. Although multiple psychosocial treatments are effective in decreasing the symptoms of disruptive behaviour disorders, comprehensive evidence regarding the comparative efficacy and acceptability between these treatments is still lacking. Therefore, we propose a systematic review and network meta-analysis, integrating both direct and indirect comparisons to obtain a hierarchy of treatment efficacy and acceptability.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
The present protocol will be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. Ten databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, OpenDissertations, The Cochrane Library, Embase and CINAHL, will be searched from inception for randomised controlled trials of psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behaviour disorders, without restrictions on language, publication year and status. The primary outcomes will be efficacy at post-treatment (severity of disruptive behaviour disorders at post-treatment) and acceptability (dropout rate for any reason) of psychosocial treatments. The secondary outcomes will involve efficacy at follow-up, severity of internalising problems and improvement of social functioning. Two authors will independently conduct the study selection and data extraction, assess the risk of bias using the revised Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and evaluate the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to network meta-analysis. We will perform Bayesian network meta-analyses with a random effects model. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
The research does not require ethical approval. Results are planned to be published in journals or presented at conferences. The network meta-analysis will provide information on a hierarchy of treatment efficacy and acceptability and help make a clinical treatment choice.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020197448.
简介
破坏性行为障碍在儿童和青少年中很常见,对青少年及其家庭和社会都有负面影响。尽管多种心理社会治疗方法可有效降低破坏性行为障碍的症状,但这些治疗方法之间的相对疗效和可接受性的综合证据仍然缺乏。因此,我们提出了一项系统评价和网络荟萃分析,综合直接和间接比较,以获得治疗效果和可接受性的层次结构。
方法和分析
本方案将根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选条目进行报告。将从最初开始,在包括 Web of Science、PubMed、PsycINFO、MEDLINE、APA PsycArticles、心理学和行为科学收藏、OpenDissertations、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase 和 CINAHL 在内的 10 个数据库中搜索针对患有破坏性行为障碍的儿童和青少年的心理社会治疗的随机对照试验,不限制语言、出版年份和状态。主要结局将是心理社会治疗在治疗后(治疗后破坏性行为障碍的严重程度)和可接受性(任何原因的辍学率)的疗效。次要结局将包括随访时的疗效、内化问题的严重程度和社会功能的改善。两名作者将独立进行研究选择和数据提取,使用修订后的 Cochrane 协作风险偏倚工具评估风险偏倚,并使用推荐评估、制定和评估框架对网络荟萃分析进行证据质量评估。我们将使用随机效应模型进行贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。将进行亚组和敏感性分析,以评估结果的稳健性。
伦理和传播
该研究不需要伦理批准。结果计划发表在期刊上或在会议上展示。网络荟萃分析将提供治疗效果和可接受性的层次结构信息,并有助于做出临床治疗选择。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020197448。
相似文献
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-8-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-23
本文引用的文献
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021-5
Psychiatr Q. 2020-3
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2017-9
J Stat Softw. 2017-8