• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺功能测试参数是否因肺活量测定参考值的不同而有所差异?一项特发性脊柱侧凸青少年的研究。

Is there any difference in pulmonary testing parameters due to spirometry reference values? A study in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

机构信息

Department of Spine Disorders and Pediatric Orthopaedics, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Rehasport Clinic, Poznan, Poland.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Jun 28;280:241-244. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210476.

DOI:10.3233/SHTI210476
PMID:34190094
Abstract

The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI 2012) presented multi-ethnic spirometry reference values that are recommended to be used instead previous Zapletals' reference values. The study aimed to compare the values of the pulmonary parameters calculated according to the Zapletals' versus the GLI 2012 reference values in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Preoperative pulmonary testing and radiographic evaluation were performed in 39 adolescents (29 females, 10 males) aged 12-17 years. The thoracic Cobb angle ranged 50°-104°. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were measured. The percentages of predicted values of FVC (%FVC) and the FEV1 (%FEV1) were calculated according to the Zapletals' reference values and to the GLI 2012 reference values. The subgroup analysis was performed for the subjects with Cobb curve 50°-74° (N=26) versus the subjects with Cobb curve 75°-104° (N=13). Mean %FVC was significantly higher using the Zapletals' reference values 86.1%±16.4 versus 84.6%±15.6 using the GLI 2012 reference values, p=0.0116. Mean %FEV1 was significantly higher using the Zapletals' reference values 84.5%±18.2 versus 80.0%±16.3 using GLI 2012 reference values, p=0.000001. The subgroup analysis revealed significant difference of %FVC in moderate (p=0.033974) and no difference in severe curves (p=0.1993). The %FEV1 differences were significant in both moderate (p=0.000011) and severe curves (p=0.0334). The study demonstrated that a significant difference might be observed in the spirometry parameters due to the applied reference values. These differences might be taken into account during the spirometry examination interpretation.

摘要

全球肺功能倡议(GLI 2012)提出了多民族肺活量参考值,建议用于替代以前的 Zapletals 参考值。本研究旨在比较特发性脊柱侧凸青少年根据 Zapletals 与 GLI 2012 参考值计算的肺参数值。对 39 例青少年(29 名女性,10 名男性)进行术前肺功能检查和影像学评估,年龄 12-17 岁。胸椎 Cobb 角范围 50°-104°。测量用力肺活量(FVC)和 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1)。根据 Zapletals 参考值和 GLI 2012 参考值计算 FVC 的预计百分比(%FVC)和 FEV1 的预计百分比(%FEV1)。对 Cobb 曲线 50°-74°(N=26)的受试者和 Cobb 曲线 75°-104°(N=13)的受试者进行亚组分析。使用 Zapletals 参考值,%FVC 均值明显更高,为 86.1%±16.4%,而使用 GLI 2012 参考值,%FVC 均值为 84.6%±15.6%,p=0.0116。使用 Zapletals 参考值,%FEV1 均值明显更高,为 84.5%±18.2%,而使用 GLI 2012 参考值,%FEV1 均值为 80.0%±16.3%,p=0.000001。亚组分析显示,中度曲线的%FVC 差异有统计学意义(p=0.033974),重度曲线的%FVC 差异无统计学意义(p=0.1993)。中度和重度曲线的%FEV1 差异均有统计学意义(p=0.000011 和 p=0.0334)。本研究表明,由于应用的参考值,肺功能参数可能会出现显著差异。在肺功能检查解释时应考虑这些差异。

相似文献

1
Is there any difference in pulmonary testing parameters due to spirometry reference values? A study in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.肺功能测试参数是否因肺活量测定参考值的不同而有所差异?一项特发性脊柱侧凸青少年的研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Jun 28;280:241-244. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210476.
2
Loss of body height due to severe thoracic curvature does impact pulmonary testing results in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.由于严重的胸脊柱弯曲导致的身高损失确实会影响特发性脊柱侧凸青少年的肺功能测试结果。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Jun 28;280:231-234. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210474.
3
Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 reference values for spirometry in South Italian children.全球肺功能倡议 2012 年南意大利儿童肺量计参考值。
Respir Med. 2017 Oct;131:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.07.061. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
4
Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 reference equations for spirometry in the Norwegian population.全球肺功能倡议 2012 年挪威人群肺量测定法参考方程。
Eur Respir J. 2016 Dec;48(6):1602-1611. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00443-2016. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
5
A Comparison of Global Lung Initiative 2012 with Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Spirometry Reference Values. Implications in Defining Obstruction.全球肺倡议 2012 与第三次国家健康和营养检查调查肺量测定参考值的比较。在定义阻塞中的意义。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Feb;16(2):225-230. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201805-317OC.
6
Pulmonary function of healthy Korean children from three independent birth cohorts: Validation of the Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 equation.韩国三个独立出生队列中健康儿童的肺功能:全球肺功能倡议 2012 方程的验证。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 Oct;56(10):3310-3320. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25622. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
7
Significant ventilatory functional restriction in adolescents with mild or moderate scoliosis during maximal exercise tolerance test.在最大运动耐量测试中,轻度或中度脊柱侧弯青少年存在显著的通气功能受限。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1610-5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000169447.55556.01.
8
Pulmonary Parameters in Adolescents with Severe Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis: Comparison Girls versus Boys.重度特发性脊柱侧弯青少年的肺功能参数:女孩与男孩的比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 19;10(8):1574. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081574.
9
Which reference equation should we use for interpreting spirometry values for First Nations Australians? A cross-sectional study.我们应该使用哪个参考方程来解释澳大利亚原住民的肺活量值?一项横断面研究。
Med J Aust. 2024 Jun 3;220(10):523-529. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52306. Epub 2024 May 13.
10
[New international reference values for spirometry: implications for clinical issues using a comparative analysis of a paediatric population].[肺量计的新国际参考值:通过对儿科人群的比较分析探讨对临床问题的影响]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2015 Sep;165(17-18):361-5. doi: 10.1007/s10354-015-0387-0. Epub 2015 Sep 16.