Suppr超能文献

家庭应对低空气湿度的措施,以缓解健康问题。

Home measures against low air humidity which may alleviate health problems.

机构信息

Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás , Goiânia , GO , Brazil .

Universidade Federal de Goiás , Goiânia , GO , Brazil .

出版信息

Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2021 Jun 25;19:eAO5484. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO5484. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Humidity and temperature are fundamental for the balance in the life cycle of living beings and, consequently, for maintaining the well-being of the human population and reducing the prevalence of infectious diseases. Thus, in order to mitigate the impact of climate change, especially in the period when humidity is not the ideal, it is necessary to adopt some assistance measures. The present experimental study aims to elucidate what would be the recommended option to improve the quality of life of the human being and to clarify which resources (air humidifier, bucket of water or wet towel) will be effective to improve the humidity of the air in times of drought and low moisture.

METHODS

The experimental study was carried out with INKBIRD hygrometers allowing the analysis of the variation of air humidity throughout the day. Three forms of treatment were established: humidifier, wet towel and bucket of water. In each room, two hygrometers were placed equidistant from the occupant of the room and their respective treatment that varied between 1m and 2m away from the headboard indoor each room. In addition, two environments were used as controls, one being an external environment and the other an internal closed environment, totaling five rooms for the study. The rooms were monitored between the end of July and the end of August 2019 in Goiania (GO).

RESULTS

Although assistance measures are used to significantly improve air pollution in times of extreme drought, there was a significant difference between them. The humidifier and a wet towel had 7.50% and 5.71% more humidity in the external relation (external control), respectively, more efficient. The volume of water, however, did not show significant difference (p>0.05) and, therefore, there was no variation.

CONCLUSION

The humidifier and the towel are treatments considered more efficient, and that there was a significant effect of distance on humidity. Therefore, 1m of distance is more efficient in increasing and/or maintaining air humidity, inducing improvements in the populations' health.

摘要

目的

湿度和温度是生物生命周期平衡的基础,因此也是维持人类福祉和降低传染病发病率的基础。因此,为了减轻气候变化的影响,特别是在湿度不理想的时期,有必要采取一些辅助措施。本实验研究旨在阐明提高人类生活质量的推荐选择,以及澄清在干旱和低湿度时期,哪种资源(空气加湿器、水桶或湿毛巾)将有效提高空气湿度。

方法

本实验研究使用 INKBIRD 湿度计进行,可分析全天空气湿度的变化。建立了三种处理方式:加湿器、湿毛巾和水桶。在每个房间内,放置了两个湿度计,距离房间内的居住者等距,其各自的处理距离床头板 1 米至 2 米不等。此外,还使用了两个环境作为对照,一个是外部环境,另一个是内部封闭环境,总共五个房间用于研究。这些房间在 2019 年 7 月底至 8 月底期间在戈亚尼亚(GO)进行监测。

结果

尽管辅助措施被用于在极端干旱时期显著改善空气污染,但它们之间存在显著差异。加湿器和湿毛巾在外部关系(外部对照)中分别增加了 7.50%和 5.71%的湿度,效果更为显著。然而,水量并没有显示出显著差异(p>0.05),因此没有变化。

结论

加湿器和毛巾被认为是更有效的处理方法,而且距离对湿度有显著影响。因此,1 米的距离在增加和/或维持空气湿度方面更为有效,从而改善人口健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb6b/8225259/84fca073f331/2317-6385-eins-19-eAO5484-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验