Radu Roxana
University of Oxford, UK.
University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Soc Media Soc. 2020 Jul 30;6(3):2056305120948190. doi: 10.1177/2056305120948190. eCollection 2020 Jul.
Online disinformation has been on the rise in recent years. A digital outbreak of disinformation has spread around the COVID-19 pandemic, often referred to as an "infodemic." Since January 2020, digital media have been both the culprits of and antidotes to misinformation. The first months of the pandemic have shown that countering disinformation online has become as important as ensuring much needed medical equipment and supplies for health workers. For many governments around the world, priority COVID-19 actions included measures such as (a) providing guidance to social media companies on taking down contentious pandemic content (e.g., India); (b) establishing special units to combat disinformation (e.g., EU, UK); and (c) criminalizing malicious coronavirus falsehood, including in relation to public health measures. This article explores the short and potential long-term effects of newly passed legislation in various countries directly targeting COVID-19 disinformation on the media, whether traditional or digital. The early actions enacted under the state-of-emergency carve new directions in negotiating the delicate balance between freedom of expression and online censorship, in particular by imposing limitations on access to information and inducing self-restraint in reporting. Based on comparative legal analysis, this article provides a timely discussion of intended and unintended consequences of such legal responses to the "infodemic," reflecting on a basic set of safeguards needed to preserve trust in online information.
近年来,网络虚假信息呈上升趋势。一场关于虚假信息的数字疫情在新冠疫情期间蔓延开来,常被称为“信息疫情”。自2020年1月以来,数字媒体既是错误信息的始作俑者,也是其解药。疫情爆发的头几个月表明,在网上对抗虚假信息已变得与为医护人员确保急需的医疗设备和物资一样重要。对世界上许多政府来说,新冠疫情的优先行动包括以下措施:(a) 就撤下有争议的疫情相关内容向社交媒体公司提供指导(如印度);(b) 设立特别单位打击虚假信息(如欧盟、英国);以及(c) 将恶意传播新冠病毒虚假信息定为刑事犯罪,包括与公共卫生措施相关的虚假信息。本文探讨了各国新通过的直接针对新冠疫情虚假信息的立法对媒体(无论是传统媒体还是数字媒体)的短期和潜在长期影响。在紧急状态下采取的早期行动在言论自由和网络审查之间的微妙平衡谈判中开辟了新方向,特别是通过限制信息获取和促使媒体自我约束报道行为。基于比较法分析,本文及时讨论了此类针对“信息疫情”的法律应对措施的预期和意外后果,思考了维护对在线信息信任所需的一套基本保障措施。