EPI Unit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
EPI Unit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Occup Environ Med. 2021 Sep;78(9):648-653. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107519. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
To assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM and IgG antibodies among workers of the three public higher education institutions of Porto, Portugal, up to July 2020.
A rapid point-of-care test for specific IgM and IgG antibodies of SARS-CoV-2 was offered to all workers (SD Biosensor STANDARD Q COVID-19 IgM/IgG Duo and STANDARD Q COVID-19 IgM/IgG Combo). Testing was performed and a questionnaire was completed by 4592 workers on a voluntary basis from 21 May to 31 July 2020. We computed the apparent IgM, IgG, and combined IgM or IgG prevalence, along with the true prevalence and 95% credible intervals (95% CrI) using Bayesian inference.
We found an apparent prevalence of 3.1% for IgM, 1.0% for IgG and 3.9% for either. The estimated true prevalence was 2.0% (95% CrI 0.1% to 4.3%) for IgM, 0.6% (95% CrI 0.0% to 1.3%) for IgG, and 2.5% (95% CrI 0.1% to 5.3%) for IgM or IgG. A SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnosis was reported by 21 (0.5%) workers; and of these, 90.5% had a reactive IgG result. Seroprevalence was higher among those reporting contacts with confirmed cases, having been quarantined, having a previous molecular negative test or having had symptoms.
The seroprevalence among workers from the three public higher education institutions of Porto after the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 infection was similar to national estimates for the same age working population. However, the estimated true seroprevalence was approximately five times higher than the reported SARS-CoV-2 infection based on a molecular test.
评估截至 2020 年 7 月葡萄牙波尔图三所公立高等教育机构工作人员中 SARS-CoV-2 特异性 IgM 和 IgG 抗体的流行率。
为所有工作人员(SD Biosensor STANDARD Q COVID-19 IgM/IgG Duo 和 STANDARD Q COVID-19 IgM/IgG Combo)提供了一种 SARS-CoV-2 特异性 IgM 和 IgG 抗体的快速即时检测。2020 年 5 月 21 日至 7 月 31 日,共有 4592 名工作人员自愿接受检测并完成问卷调查。我们通过贝叶斯推断计算了明显的 IgM、IgG 和 IgM 或 IgG 联合流行率,以及真实流行率和 95%可信区间(95%CrI)。
我们发现 IgM 的明显流行率为 3.1%,IgG 的流行率为 1.0%,而 IgM 或 IgG 的流行率为 3.9%。IgM 的真实流行率估计为 2.0%(95%CrI 0.1%至 4.3%),IgG 的真实流行率估计为 0.6%(95%CrI 0.0%至 1.3%),而 IgM 或 IgG 的真实流行率估计为 2.5%(95%CrI 0.1%至 5.3%)。有 21 名(0.5%)工作人员报告了 SARS-CoV-2 分子诊断;其中,90.5%的 IgG 检测结果为阳性。与确诊病例有接触、被隔离、先前分子检测为阴性或有症状的工作人员的血清阳性率更高。
在 SARS-CoV-2 感染的第一波过后,波尔图三所公立高等教育机构工作人员的血清流行率与全国同年龄工作人群的估计值相似。然而,基于分子检测报告的 SARS-CoV-2 感染,估计的真实血清流行率大约是其五倍。