Rajagopal Karthikeyan, Dutt Vivek, Balakumar B, Chilbule Sanjay K, Walter Noel, Nair Prabha D, Madhuri Vrisha
Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India.
Center for Stem Cell Research (a Unit of inStem, Bengaluru), Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 India.
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Jan 3;55(4):853-860. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00290-5. eCollection 2021 Aug.
This study tested the long-term efficacy of two synthetic scaffolds for osteochondral defects and compare the outcomes with that of an established technique that uses monolayer cultured chondrocytes in a rabbit model.
Articular cartilage defect was created in both knees of 18 rabbits and divided into three groups of six in each. The defects in first group receiving cells loaded on Scaffold A (polyvinyl alcohol-polycaprolactone semi-interpenetrating polymer network (Monophasic, PVA-PCL semi-IPN), the second on Scaffold B (biphasic, PVA-PCL incorporated with bioglass as the lower layer), and the third group received chondrocytes alone. One animal from each group was sacrificed at 2 months and the rest at 1 year. O'Driscoll's score measured the quality of cartilage repair.
The histological outcome had good scores (22, 20, and 19) for all three groups at 2 months. At 1-year follow-up, the chondrocyte alone group had the best scores (mean 20.0 ± 1.4), while the group treated by PVA-PCL semi-IPN scaffolds fared better (mean 15 ± 4.2) than the group that received biphasic scaffolds (mean 11.8 ± 5.9). In all three groups, defects treated without cells scored less than the transplant.
These results indicate that while these scaffolds with chondrocytes perform well initially, their late outcome is disappointing. We propose that for all scaffold-based tissue repairs, a long-term evaluation should be mandatory. The slow degrading scaffolds need further modifications to improve the milieu for long-term growth of chondrocytes and their hyaline phenotype for the better incorporation of tissue-engineered constructs.
本研究测试了两种合成支架对兔关节软骨缺损的长期疗效,并将结果与使用单层培养软骨细胞的既定技术进行比较。
在18只兔的双膝关节制造关节软骨缺损,并将其分为三组,每组6只。第一组缺损处植入负载细胞的支架A(聚乙烯醇-聚己内酯半互穿聚合物网络(单相,PVA-PCL半互穿网络)),第二组植入支架B(双相,下层结合生物玻璃的PVA-PCL),第三组仅植入软骨细胞。每组在2个月时处死1只动物,其余在1年时处死。用奥德里斯科尔评分法评估软骨修复质量。
在2个月时,所有三组的组织学结果评分均良好(分别为22、20和19)。在1年随访时,仅软骨细胞组评分最佳(平均20.0±1.4),而接受PVA-PCL半互穿网络支架治疗的组(平均15±4.2)比接受双相支架治疗的组(平均11.8±5.9)表现更好。在所有三组中,未植入细胞治疗的缺损评分低于移植组。
这些结果表明,虽然这些负载软骨细胞的支架最初表现良好,但其后期结果令人失望。我们建议,对于所有基于支架的组织修复,长期评估应成为强制性要求。降解缓慢的支架需要进一步改进,以改善软骨细胞长期生长的环境及其透明软骨表型,从而更好地整合组织工程构建体。