Colburn Abigail T, Johnson Evan C, Péronnet François, Jansen Lisa T, Capitan-Jimenez Catalina, Adams J D, Guelinckx Isabelle, Perrier Erica T, Mauromoustakos Andy, Kavouras Stavros A
Hydration Science Lab, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Human Integrated Physiology Laboratory, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States.
Front Nutr. 2021 Jun 14;8:676697. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.676697. eCollection 2021.
The purpose of this investigation was to assess the validity and reliability of a seven-day water frequency questionnaire (TWI-FQ) to estimate daily total water intake (TWI) in comparison to a water turnover objective reference value via deuterium oxide (DO). Data collection occurred over 3 weeks, with a wash-out period during week two. Healthy adults ( = 98; 52% female; 41 ± 14 y; BMI, 26.4 ± 5.5 kg·m) retrospectively self-reported consumption frequencies of 17 liquids and 35 foods with specified volumes/amounts for weeks one and three via TWI-FQ. Standard water content values were utilized to determine the volume of water consumed from each liquid and food for calculation of mean daily TWI for each week. Diet records were completed daily during week two to estimate metabolic water production. To assess validity of the TWI-FQ, participants consumed DO at the start of each week and provided urine samples immediately before ingestion, the following day, and at the end of the week to calculate water turnover. Metabolic water was subtracted from water turnover to estimate TWI. TWI-FQ validity was assessed via Bland-Altman plot for multiple observations. Reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation and Pearson's correlation between weeks. TWI-FQ significantly underestimated DO TWI by -350 ± 1,431 mL·d (95% confidence interval (CI): -551, -149 mL·d). TWI-FQ TWI was significantly correlated ( = 0.707, <0.01) and not different (198 ± 1,180 mL·d, 95% CI: -38, 435 mL·d) between weeks. TWI-FQ intraclass correlation = 0.706 was significant [95% CI: 0.591, 0.793; = 5.799], indicating moderate test-retest reliability. While this tool would not be suitable for individual TWI assessment, the magnitude of bias may be acceptable for assessment at the sample-level.
本研究的目的是评估一份为期七天的饮水频率问卷(TWI-FQ)相对于通过氧化氘(DO)得出的水周转率客观参考值来估算每日总水摄入量(TWI)的有效性和可靠性。数据收集持续了3周,第二周为洗脱期。健康成年人(n = 98;52%为女性;41±14岁;BMI,26.4±5.5kg·m²)在第一周和第三周通过TWI-FQ回顾性地自我报告了17种液体和35种食物的消费频率及指定的体积/数量。利用标准含水量值来确定从每种液体和食物中摄入的水量,以计算每周的平均每日TWI。在第二周每天完成饮食记录,以估算代谢水的产生量。为了评估TWI-FQ的有效性,参与者在每周开始时饮用DO,并在摄入前、第二天和周末立即提供尿液样本,以计算水周转率。从水周转率中减去代谢水以估算TWI。通过Bland-Altman图对多次观察结果评估TWI-FQ的有效性。通过组内相关性以及各周之间的Pearson相关性评估可靠性。TWI-FQ显著低估了DO的TWI,差值为-350±1431mL·d(95%置信区间(CI):-551,-149mL·d)。TWI-FQ的TWI在各周之间显著相关(r = 0.707,P<0.01)且无差异(198±1180mL·d,95%CI:-38,435mL·d)。TWI-FQ的组内相关性为0.706,具有显著性[95%CI:0.591,0.793;F = 5.799],表明具有中等的重测信度。虽然该工具不适用于个体TWI评估,但对于样本水平的评估而言,偏差幅度可能是可接受的。