Department of Communication, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Department of Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
J Health Commun. 2021 May 4;26(5):339-349. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2021.1943728. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
While e-cigarette use increases in the US., people's knowledge about e-cigarettes is limited. Information seeking may influence people's knowledge about e-cigarettes. Using the risk perception attitude framework and the identity theory, this study examined if U.S. adult current smokers ( = 1,841) differing in perceived efficacy of switching completely to e-cigarettes, perceived risk of cigarette smoking, and smoking identity report different levels of intentions to seek information about e-cigarettes. Results revealed that smokers with high perceived risk of smoking and perceived efficacy about switching completely to e-cigarettes (responsive group) reported strongest intentions to seek information about e-cigarettes (5.41 on a 1-7 scale), followed by the group having low smoking risk perceptions and high e-cigarette efficacy beliefs (proactive group; = 4.58), the group having high smoking risk perceptions and low e-cigarette efficacy beliefs (avoidance group; = 3.18), and the group low on both factors (indifference group; 2.76). The differences between responsive group and proactive, avoidance, and indifference groups were greater among smokers with high ( = 6.14) vs. low ( = 5.27) smoking identity. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
在美国,电子烟的使用量不断增加,而人们对电子烟的了解却很有限。信息搜索可能会影响人们对电子烟的了解。本研究运用风险感知态度框架和身份理论,检验了美国成年当前吸烟者(n=1841)在完全改用电子烟的感知效果、吸烟风险感知以及吸烟身份方面的差异是否会导致他们对电子烟信息搜索的意图存在差异。结果表明,那些认为吸烟风险高、完全改用电子烟效果好的吸烟者(反应组)报告称他们有最强的搜索电子烟信息的意图(1-7 分制下为 5.41),其次是那些认为吸烟风险低、电子烟效果信念高的吸烟者(积极组; = 4.58),那些认为吸烟风险高、电子烟效果信念低的吸烟者(回避组; = 3.18),以及那些在这两个因素上都得分较低的吸烟者(冷漠组; = 2.76)。在高( = 6.14)和低( = 5.27)吸烟身份的吸烟者中,反应组与积极组、回避组和冷漠组之间的差异更大。讨论了研究结果的理论和实践意义。