University of Groningen, Department of Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University of Groningen, Center for Rehabilitation, Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Aug 1;147(8):717-728. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.1290.
Understanding how the quality of life of adults (≥18 years) with peripheral facial palsy can be estimated using clinician measures of facial function and patient-reported variables might aid in counseling patients and in conducting research.
To analyze associations between clinician-graded facial function and patient-reported quality of life in adults with peripheral facial palsy, compare associations between facial function and the physical and social functions of quality of life, and examine factors that might influence the associations.
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and PsycInfo on June 4, 2020, with no restrictions on the start date.
Twenty-three studies reporting an association between clinician-graded facial function and patient-reported quality of life in adults with peripheral facial palsy were included. Facial function instruments included the House-Brackmann, Sunnybrook Facial Grading System, and electronic clinician-graded facial function assessment. Quality-of-life instruments included the Facial Disability Index and Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale.
Data extraction and qualitative synthesis were performed according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Record screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were done by 2 researchers independently. Data were pooled using random-effects models.
The main outcome was the association between facial function and quality of life, quantified by Pearson r, Spearman ρ, or regression analysis.
In total, 23 studies (3746 participants) were included. In the 21 studies that reported on the sex of the cohorts, there were 2073 women (57.3%). Mean or median age ranged from 21 to 64 years and mean or median duration of palsy ranged from newly diagnosed to 12 years. Bell palsy (n = 1397), benign tumor (n = 980), and infection (n = 257) were the most common etiologic factors. Pooled correlation coefficients were 0.424 (95% CI, 0.375-0.471) to 0.533 (95% CI, 0.447-0.610) between facial function and Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale total, 0.324 (95% CI, 0.128-0.495) to 0.397 (95% CI, 0.242-0.532) between facial function and Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale social function, 0.423 (95% CI, 0.322-0.514) to 0.605 (95% CI, -0.124-0.910) between facial function and Facial Disability Index physical function, and 0.166 (95% CI, 0.044-0.283) to 0.208 (95% CI, 0.031-0.373) between facial function and Facial Disability Index social function.
Associations noted in this systematic review and meta-analysis were overall low to moderate, suggesting that only a small part of quality of life is explained by facial function. Associations were higher between facial function and physical function than social function of quality of life.
了解成年人(≥18 岁)的生活质量如何可以通过临床医生评估的面部功能和患者报告的变量来估计,这可能有助于为患者提供咨询并进行研究。
分析成年人周围性面瘫患者的临床医生分级面部功能与患者报告的生活质量之间的关联,比较面部功能与生活质量的生理和社会功能之间的关联,并研究可能影响关联的因素。
2020 年 6 月 4 日,在 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 PsycInfo 中进行了文献检索,没有对开始日期进行限制。
纳入了 23 项研究,这些研究报告了成年人周围性面瘫患者的临床医生分级面部功能与患者报告的生活质量之间的关联。面部功能评估工具包括 House-Brackmann、Sunnybrook 面部分级系统和电子临床医生分级面部功能评估。生活质量评估工具包括面部残疾指数和面部临床计量评估量表。
根据观察性研究的荟萃分析流行病学指南进行数据提取和定性综合。两名研究人员独立进行记录筛选、数据提取和质量评估。使用随机效应模型对数据进行汇总。
主要结果是面部功能和生活质量之间的关联,通过 Pearson r、Spearman ρ 或回归分析来量化。
共纳入 23 项研究(3746 名参与者)。在报告队列性别情况的 21 项研究中,有 2073 名女性(57.3%)。平均或中位数年龄从 21 岁到 64 岁不等,平均或中位数面瘫持续时间从新发至 12 年不等。贝尔面瘫(n=1397)、良性肿瘤(n=980)和感染(n=257)是最常见的病因因素。汇总的相关系数在面部功能与面部临床计量评估量表总分之间为 0.424(95%CI,0.375-0.471)至 0.533(95%CI,0.447-0.610),在面部功能与面部临床计量评估量表社会功能之间为 0.324(95%CI,0.128-0.495)至 0.397(95%CI,0.242-0.532),在面部功能与面部残疾指数生理功能之间为 0.423(95%CI,0.322-0.514)至 0.605(95%CI,-0.124-0.910),在面部功能与面部残疾指数社会功能之间为 0.166(95%CI,0.044-0.283)至 0.208(95%CI,0.031-0.373)。
本系统评价和荟萃分析中的关联总体上为低到中度,表明只有一小部分生活质量可以用面部功能来解释。面部功能与生理功能的关联高于社会功能。