McCloskey J C, McCain B
College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Nurs Res. 1988 Sep-Oct;37(5):308-13.
The present report compares four sets of performance data from two studies in which the same instrument was used. Head nurses' rankings of staff nurses' performance on 52 specific skills were compared with the staff nurses' own rankings. The findings are in remarkable agreement on the skills that nurses perform well and those that need improvement. Spearman correlation coefficients of skills comparing head nurse and staff nurse rankings were r = .787 and .823, rankings of two sets of head nurses, r = .896, and rankings of two sets of staff nurses, r = .889. For all nurses, professional development skills were performed well and teaching/collaboration skills needed improvement.
本报告比较了两项研究中的四组绩效数据，这两项研究使用了相同的工具。将护士长对52项特定技能的护士绩效排名与护士自身的排名进行了比较。在护士表现出色的技能和需要改进的技能方面，研究结果达成了显著共识。护士长与护士排名的技能斯皮尔曼相关系数分别为r = 0.787和0.823，两组护士长排名的相关系数为r = 0.896，两组护士排名的相关系数为r = 0.889。对于所有护士来说，专业发展技能表现良好，教学/协作技能需要改进。
