• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受方案驱动复苏集束治疗的菌血症性脓毒症休克患者血培养阳性时间的预后价值:一项回顾性队列研究

Prognostic Value of the Time-to-Positivity in Blood Cultures from Septic Shock Patients with Bacteremia Receiving Protocol-Driven Resuscitation Bundle Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Bae Hong-Jun, Kim June-Sung, Kim Muyeol, Kim Youn-Jung, Kim Won Young

机构信息

Asan Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul 05505, Korea.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jun 8;10(6):683. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060683.

DOI:10.3390/antibiotics10060683
PMID:34201159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8228862/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the prognostic value of the time-to-positivity in patients with culture-positive septic shock.

METHODS

Retrospective study using a prospective data registry was performed at the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. Consecutive adult patients with septic shock (N = 2499) were enrolled between 2014 and 2018. Bacteremia was defined using blood cultures, and viral and fungal pathogens were excluded. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

In 803 (46.7%) septic shock patients with bacteremia, median TTP was 10.1 h. The most prevalent isolated bacterial pathogens were (40.8%) and (23.4%). Although the TTP correlated with a higher sequential organ failure assessment score (Spearman's rho = -0.12, < 0.01), it showed no significant difference between the 28-day survivors and non-survivors (10.2 vs. 9.4 days, = 0.35). In subgroup analysis of the and bacteremia cases, a shorter TTP showed prognostic value for predicting the 28-day mortality. The optimal TTP cut-off for and was 10 h and 8 h, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic value of the TTP in septic shock patients receiving bundle therapy may be limited and its clinical interpretation should only be made on a pathogen-specific basis.

摘要

引言

评估培养阳性的感染性休克患者阳性时间的预后价值。

方法

在一家三级医院的急诊科进行了一项使用前瞻性数据登记的回顾性研究。纳入了2014年至2018年间连续的成年感染性休克患者(N = 2499)。通过血培养定义菌血症,并排除病毒和真菌病原体。主要结局是28天死亡率。

结果

在803例(46.7%)菌血症感染性休克患者中,中位阳性时间为10.1小时。最常见的分离细菌病原体是(40.8%)和(23.4%)。虽然阳性时间与较高的序贯器官衰竭评估评分相关(Spearman相关系数=-0.12,<0.01),但在28天存活者和非存活者之间无显著差异(10.2天对9.4天,=0.35)。在和菌血症病例的亚组分析中,较短的阳性时间对预测28天死亡率具有预后价值。和菌血症的最佳阳性时间截断值分别为10小时和8小时。

结论

在接受集束治疗的感染性休克患者中,阳性时间的预后价值可能有限,其临床解读应仅基于病原体特异性进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/8228862/243c89d34e81/antibiotics-10-00683-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/8228862/98901c6c5c0c/antibiotics-10-00683-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/8228862/191d0122a1c2/antibiotics-10-00683-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/8228862/48b4f38a5db6/antibiotics-10-00683-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/8228862/243c89d34e81/antibiotics-10-00683-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/8228862/98901c6c5c0c/antibiotics-10-00683-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/8228862/191d0122a1c2/antibiotics-10-00683-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/8228862/48b4f38a5db6/antibiotics-10-00683-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b29/8228862/243c89d34e81/antibiotics-10-00683-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic Value of the Time-to-Positivity in Blood Cultures from Septic Shock Patients with Bacteremia Receiving Protocol-Driven Resuscitation Bundle Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.接受方案驱动复苏集束治疗的菌血症性脓毒症休克患者血培养阳性时间的预后价值:一项回顾性队列研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jun 8;10(6):683. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060683.
2
Prognostic roles of time to positivity of blood cultures in patients with bacteremia.血培养阳性时间对菌血症患者预后的作用。
Epidemiol Infect. 2020 May 8;148:e101. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820000941.
3
Prognostic role of time to positivity of blood culture in children with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia.血培养阳性时间对儿童铜绿假单胞菌菌血症的预后作用。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 9;20(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05257-3.
4
Time to positivity of Klebsiella pneumoniae in blood culture as prognostic indicator for pediatric bloodstream infections.肺炎克雷伯菌血培养阳性时间作为儿童血流感染的预后指标。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Nov;179(11):1689-1698. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03675-8. Epub 2020 May 11.
5
The Prognostic Value of Time to Positivity of in Blood Cultures of Elderly Patients With Intra-Abdominal Infection.老年腹腔内感染患者血培养阳性时间的预后价值
J Acute Med. 2023 Dec;13(4):137-143. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202312_13(4).0001.
6
Short time to positivity of blood culture predicts mortality and septic shock in bacteremic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血培养阳性时间短可预测菌血症患者的死亡率和感染性休克:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 10;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07098-8.
7
Time to positivity in blood cultures of adults with nontyphoidal Salmonella bacteremia.非伤寒沙门菌血症成年患者血培养的阳性时间
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2016 Jun;49(3):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
8
Clinical impact of time-to-positivity of blood cultures on mortality in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia.血培养阳性时间对铜绿假单胞菌菌血症患者死亡率的临床影响。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Sep;30:269-275. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.06.026. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
9
Time to positivity of blood culture is a risk factor for clinical outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia children: a retrospective study.血培养阳性时间是金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患儿临床结局的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 May 17;19(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3993-4.
10
Prognostic roles of time to positivity of blood culture in children with Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia.血培养阳性时间对儿童肺炎链球菌菌血症的预后作用。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Mar;38(3):457-465. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-03443-5. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Clinical Utility and Stewardship Challenges of Time to Blood Culture Positivity.血培养阳性时间的临床效用及管理挑战
Hosp Pharm. 2025 Aug 27:00185787251364488. doi: 10.1177/00185787251364488.
2
Diagnostic and prognostic value of time to positivity in blood cultures. An opinion paper.血培养阳性时间的诊断和预后价值。一篇观点论文。
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2025 Feb;38(1):8-20. doi: 10.37201/req/094.2024. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Serum Thrombomodulin Level Can Predict Mortality in Patients With Sepsis?血清血栓调节蛋白水平能否预测脓毒症患者的死亡率?

本文引用的文献

1
Association between right ventricle dysfunction and poor outcome in patients with septic shock.右心功能障碍与感染性休克患者预后不良的关系。
Heart. 2020 Nov;106(21):1665-1671. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316889. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Prognostic roles of time to positivity of blood cultures in patients with bacteremia.血培养阳性时间对菌血症患者预后的作用。
Epidemiol Infect. 2020 May 8;148:e101. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820000941.
3
Challenges in the management of septic shock: a narrative review.脓毒性休克管理面临的挑战:叙事性综述。
Med Arch. 2023;77(6):433-439. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2023.77.433-439.
4
The Prognostic Value of Time to Positivity of in Blood Cultures of Elderly Patients With Intra-Abdominal Infection.老年腹腔内感染患者血培养阳性时间的预后价值
J Acute Med. 2023 Dec;13(4):137-143. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202312_13(4).0001.
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Apr;45(4):420-433. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05544-x. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
4
Value of Time to Positivity of Blood Culture in Children with Bloodstream Infections.血培养阳性时间在儿童血流感染中的价值
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2019 Jan 10;2019:5975837. doi: 10.1155/2019/5975837. eCollection 2019.
5
Risk Factors for Same Pathogen Sepsis Readmission Following Hospitalization for Septic Shock.感染性休克住院治疗后同一病原体败血症再入院的危险因素。
J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 3;8(2):181. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020181.
6
Time-to-Positivity of Blood Cultures in Children With Sepsis.脓毒症患儿血培养阳性时间
Front Pediatr. 2018 Aug 8;6:222. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00222. eCollection 2018.
7
Time to blood culture positivity: An independent predictor of infective endocarditis and mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.血培养阳性时间:金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者感染性心内膜炎和死亡的独立预测因子。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Apr;25(4):481-488. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
8
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
9
Time to positivity of blood cultures in patients with bloodstream infections: A useful prognostic tool.血流感染患者血培养的阳性时间:一种有用的预后工具。
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2017 Dec;35(10):638-644. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
10
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准:用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.