• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲学术神经外科领域的女性参与情况——一项横断面分析

Female Participation in Academic European Neurosurgery-A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

作者信息

Conzen Catharina, Hakvoort Karlijn, Clusmann Hans, Höllig Anke

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 23;11(7):834. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070834.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci11070834
PMID:34201890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8301744/
Abstract

The study aims to provide data on authors' gender distribution with special attention on publications from Europe. Articles (October 2019-March 2020) published in three representative neurosurgical journals () were analyzed with regard to female participation. Out of 648 publications, 503 original articles were analyzed: 17.5% ( = 670) of the 3.821 authors were female, with 15.7% ( = 79) females as first and 9.5% ( = 48) as last authors. The lowest ratio of female first and last authors was seen in original articles published in the (12.3%/7.7% vs. 14.9%/10.6% and 23.0/11.5%). Articles originated in Europe made up 29.8% (female author ratio 21.1% ( = 226)). Female first authorship was seen in 20.7% and last authorship in 10.7% (15.3% and 7.3% were affiliated to a neurosurgical department). The percentages of female authorship were lower if non-original articles ( = 145) were analyzed (11.7% first/4.8% last authorships). Female participation in editorial boards was 8.0%. Considering the percentages of European female neurosurgeons, the current data are proportional. However, the lack of female last authors, the discrepancy regarding non-original articles and the composition of the editorial boards indicate that there still is a structural underrepresentation and that females are limited in achieving powerful positions.

摘要

该研究旨在提供作者性别分布数据,特别关注来自欧洲的出版物。对在三种代表性神经外科期刊()上发表的文章(2019年10月至2020年3月)进行了女性参与情况分析。在648篇出版物中,分析了503篇原创文章:3821名作者中有17.5%(=670)为女性,其中15.7%(=79)为第一作者,9.5%(=48)为最后作者。在发表于的原创文章中,女性第一作者和最后作者的比例最低(分别为12.3%/7.7%,而在和中分别为14.9%/10.6%以及23.0%/11.5%)。源自欧洲的文章占29.8%(女性作者比例为21.1%(=226))。女性第一作者占20.7%,最后作者占10.7%(15.3%和7.3%隶属于神经外科部门)。如果分析非原创文章(=145),女性作者的比例较低(第一作者为11.7%/最后作者为4.8%)。女性在编辑委员会中的参与率为8.0%。考虑到欧洲女性神经外科医生的比例,目前的数据是成比例的。然而,女性最后作者的缺乏、非原创文章方面的差异以及编辑委员会的组成表明,仍然存在结构性的代表性不足,并且女性在获得有影响力的职位方面受到限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d63c/8301744/1fbd8cf44d8b/brainsci-11-00834-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d63c/8301744/57a9a9aebc86/brainsci-11-00834-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d63c/8301744/40de6916445b/brainsci-11-00834-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d63c/8301744/f9d2b59ebfb7/brainsci-11-00834-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d63c/8301744/1fbd8cf44d8b/brainsci-11-00834-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d63c/8301744/57a9a9aebc86/brainsci-11-00834-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d63c/8301744/40de6916445b/brainsci-11-00834-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d63c/8301744/f9d2b59ebfb7/brainsci-11-00834-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d63c/8301744/1fbd8cf44d8b/brainsci-11-00834-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Female Participation in Academic European Neurosurgery-A Cross-Sectional Analysis.欧洲学术神经外科领域的女性参与情况——一项横断面分析
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 23;11(7):834. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070834.
2
Does double-blind peer review impact gender authorship trends? An evaluation of two leading neurosurgical journals from 2010 to 2019.双盲同行评审会影响作者性别趋势吗?对2010年至2019年两本领先神经外科期刊的评估。
J Neurosurg. 2021 Aug 1;135(2):352-360. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.JNS20902. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
3
Women's role in neurosurgical research: is the gender gap improving?女性在神经外科学研究中的角色:性别差距是否在改善?
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Mar;50(3):E6. doi: 10.3171/2020.12.FOCUS20911.
4
Composition and Gender Distribution of Editorial Boards for Top Neurosurgical Journals.顶尖神经外科学期刊编委会的组成和性别分布。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Aug;176:189-198. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
Increases in female academic productivity and female mentorship highlight sustained progress in previously identified neurosurgical gender disparities.女性学术产出的增加以及女性导师指导人数的增多突显了在先前已确定的神经外科性别差异方面所取得的持续进展。
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Mar;50(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2020.12.FOCUS20939.
6
Women in Neurosurgery: Gender Differences in Authorship in High-Impact Neurosurgery Journals through the Last Two Decades.神经外科中的女性:过去二十年高影响力神经外科学期刊中作者署名的性别差异。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jun;138:374-380. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
How Many Neurosurgeons Does It Take to Author an Article and What Are the Other Factors That Impact Citations?需要多少神经外科医生才能撰写一篇文章,以及哪些其他因素会影响引用量?
World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;146:e993-e1002. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.058. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
8
Quantitative Description of Osteopathic Physician Authorship in Prominent Neurosurgery Journals Since 1944: Coming of Age?1944年以来整骨疗法医生在著名神经外科期刊上发表文章情况的定量描述:走向成熟?
Cureus. 2018 Aug 9;10(8):e3124. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3124.
9
Scientific authorship in neurosurgery.神经外科学术著作署名。
Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed). 2023 Jul-Aug;34(4):194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.neucie.2022.11.007. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
10
Gender Trends in Authorship in Psychiatry Journals From 2008 to 2018.2008 年至 2018 年精神病学期刊作者性别趋势。
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 15;86(8):639-646. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The gender gap in European neurosurgical conference presentations.欧洲神经外科学术会议演讲中的性别差距。
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Mar;50(3):E7. doi: 10.3171/2020.12.FOCUS20885.
2
Women's role in neurosurgical research: is the gender gap improving?女性在神经外科学研究中的角色:性别差距是否在改善?
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Mar;50(3):E6. doi: 10.3171/2020.12.FOCUS20911.
3
Women in neurosurgery: where does the United Kingdom stand?神经外科中的女性:英国处于什么位置?
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Mar;50(3):E14. doi: 10.3171/2020.12.FOCUS20957.
4
Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals.同行评审与性别偏见:对145种学术期刊的研究
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 6;7(2). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd0299. Print 2021 Jan.
5
Pay gaps in medicine and the impact of COVID-19 on doctors' careers.医学领域的薪酬差距以及新冠疫情对医生职业生涯的影响。
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):79-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32671-4. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
6
Graduate Medical Education, 2019-2020.毕业后医学教育,2019 - 2020年
JAMA. 2020 Sep 22;324(12):1230-1250. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14635.
7
When a Specialty Becomes "Women's Work": Trends in and Implications of Specialty Gender Segregation in Medicine.当专科成为“女性的工作”:医学专科性别隔离的趋势及影响。
Acad Med. 2020 Oct;95(10):1499-1506. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003555.
8
Women in Neurosurgery: Gender Differences in Authorship in High-Impact Neurosurgery Journals through the Last Two Decades.神经外科中的女性:过去二十年高影响力神经外科学期刊中作者署名的性别差异。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jun;138:374-380. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Sex Differences in Salaries of Department Chairs at Public Medical Schools.公立医学院系主任薪酬的性别差异。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):789-792. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7540.
10
Gender Disparity in Authorship of Peer-Reviewed Medical Publications.医学学术出版物同行评审作者中的性别差异。
Am J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;360(5):511-516. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 25.