Medrinal Clément, Gillet Alexis, Boujibar Fairuz, Dugernier Jonathan, Zwahlen Marcel, Lamia Bouchra, Girault Christophe, Creteur Jacques, Fellrath Jean-Marc, Haesler Laurence, Lagache Laurie, Goubert Laure, Artaud Macari Elise, Taton Olivier, Gouin Philippe, Leduc Dimitri, Van Hove Olivier, Norrenberg Michelle, Prieur Guillaume, Combret Yann, Correvon Nils, Hilfiker Roger, Contal Olivier
UVSQ, Erphan, Paris-Saclay University, 78000 Versailles, France.
Intensive Care Unit Department, Le Havre Hospital, Avenue Pierre Mendes France, 76290 Montivilliers, France.
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 24;10(13):2783. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132783.
The current gold-standard treatment for COVID-19-related hypoxemic respiratory failure is invasive mechanical ventilation. However, do not intubate orders (DNI), prevent the use of this treatment in some cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate if non-invasive ventilatory supports can provide a good therapeutic alternative to invasive ventilation in patients with severe COVID-19 infection and a DNI. Data were collected from four centres in three European countries. Patients with severe COVID-19 infection were included. We emulated a hypothetical target trial in which outcomes were compared in patients with a DNI order treated exclusively by non-invasive respiratory support with patients who could be intubated if necessary. We set up a propensity score and an inverse probability of treatment weighting to remove confounding by indication. Four-hundred patients were included: 270 were eligible for intubation and 130 had a DNI order. The adjusted risk ratio for death among patients eligible for intubation was 0.81 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.42). The median length of stay in acute care for survivors was similar between groups (18 (10-31) vs. (19 (13-23.5); = 0.76). The use of non-invasive respiratory support is a good compromise for patients with severe COVID-19 and a do not intubate order.
目前,针对新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)相关的低氧性呼吸衰竭,金标准治疗方法是有创机械通气。然而,“不要插管”医嘱(DNI)在某些情况下会阻止使用这种治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估在患有严重COVID-19感染且有DNI医嘱的患者中,无创通气支持能否为有创通气提供良好的治疗替代方案。数据收集自三个欧洲国家的四个中心。纳入了患有严重COVID-19感染的患者。我们模拟了一项假设的目标试验,比较了仅接受无创呼吸支持治疗的有DNI医嘱患者与必要时可插管患者的结局。我们设置了倾向评分和治疗权重的逆概率以消除指征性混杂因素。共纳入400例患者:270例符合插管条件,130例有DNI医嘱。符合插管条件的患者中,调整后的死亡风险比为0.81(95%置信区间0.46至1.42)。两组幸存者在急性护理中的中位住院时间相似(分别为18(10 - 31)天和19(13 - 23.5)天;P = 0.76)。对于患有严重COVID-19且有“不要插管”医嘱的患者,使用无创呼吸支持是一个很好的折衷方案。