• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在新冠疫情第二波和第三波期间持续气道正压通气的使用情况

The use of continuous positive airway pressure during the second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Brusasco Claudia, Corradi Francesco, Dazzi Federico, Isirdi Alessandro, Romei Chiara, Parisini Andrea, Boni Silvia, Santori Gregorio, Brusasco Vito

机构信息

Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.

Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

ERJ Open Res. 2023 Mar 6;9(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00365-2022. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.1183/23120541.00365-2022
PMID:36879904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9675983/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a preliminary study during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave, we reported a high rate of success with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preventing death and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). That study, however, was too small to identify risk factors for mortality, barotrauma and impact on subsequent IMV. Thus, we re-evaluated the efficacy of the same CPAP protocol in a larger series of patients during second and third pandemic waves.

METHODS

281 COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (158 full-code and 123 do-not-intubate (DNI)), were managed with high-flow CPAP early in their hospitalisation. IMV was considered after 4 days of unsuccessful CPAP.

RESULTS

The overall recovery rate from respiratory failure was 50% in the DNI and 89% in the full-code group. Among the latter, 71% recovered with CPAP-only, 3% died under CPAP and 26% were intubated after a median CPAP time of 7 days (IQR: 5-12 days). Of the patients who were intubated, 68% recovered and were discharged from the hospital within 28 days. Barotrauma occurred during CPAP in <4% of patients. Age (OR 1.128; p <0.001) and tomographic severity score (OR 1.139; p=0.006) were the only independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Early treatment with CPAP is a safe option for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情第一波期间的一项初步研究中,我们报告了持续气道正压通气(CPAP)在预防死亡和有创机械通气(IMV)方面的高成功率。然而,该研究规模太小,无法确定死亡率、气压伤的危险因素以及对后续IMV的影响。因此,我们在疫情第二波和第三波期间,对更多患者重新评估了相同CPAP方案的疗效。

方法

281例中度至重度急性低氧性呼吸衰竭的新冠患者(158例为全力抢救患者,123例为不插管(DNI)患者)在住院早期接受了高流量CPAP治疗。CPAP治疗4天无效后考虑进行IMV。

结果

DNI组呼吸衰竭的总体恢复率为50%,全力抢救组为89%。在后者中,71%仅通过CPAP恢复,3%在CPAP治疗期间死亡,26%在CPAP治疗中位时间7天(四分位间距:5 - 12天)后插管。在插管患者中,68%恢复并在28天内出院。CPAP治疗期间气压伤发生率<4%。年龄(比值比1.128;p<0.001)和断层扫描严重程度评分(比值比1.139;p = 0.006)是仅有的死亡率独立预测因素。

结论

对于新冠所致急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者,早期使用CPAP治疗是一种安全的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fe/9986748/efed3ca53c32/00365-2022.04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fe/9986748/b961f59c2e4f/00365-2022.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fe/9986748/040d59b2614b/00365-2022.02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fe/9986748/3792ae96681d/00365-2022.03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fe/9986748/efed3ca53c32/00365-2022.04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fe/9986748/b961f59c2e4f/00365-2022.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fe/9986748/040d59b2614b/00365-2022.02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fe/9986748/3792ae96681d/00365-2022.03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49fe/9986748/efed3ca53c32/00365-2022.04.jpg

相似文献

1
The use of continuous positive airway pressure during the second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情第二波和第三波期间持续气道正压通气的使用情况
ERJ Open Res. 2023 Mar 6;9(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00365-2022. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
CPAP delivered outside critical care during the second wave of COVID-19: outcomes from a UK respiratory surge unit.COVID-19 疫情第二波期间在重症监护之外使用 CPAP:来自英国呼吸急救单位的结果。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Sep;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000907.
3
Nursing evaluation during treatment with helmet continuous positive airway pressure in patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia: A case series.COVID-19 肺炎所致呼吸衰竭患者行头盔持续气道正压通气治疗中的护理评估:病例系列研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2022 Jan;35(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
4
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
5
Use of protracted CPAP as supportive treatment for COVID-19 pneumonitis and associated outcomes: a national cohort study.使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)作为 COVID-19 肺炎的支持性治疗及其相关结局:一项全国性队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Sep;131(3):617-625. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.05.012. Epub 2023 May 25.
6
Outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with continuous positive airway pressure outside the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房以外接受持续气道正压通气治疗的新冠病毒肺炎患者的治疗结果
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Jan 25;7(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00541-2020. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Positive role of continuous positive airway pressure for intensive care unit patients with severe hypoxaemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia: A single centre experience.持续气道正压通气对因新型冠状病毒肺炎导致严重低氧血症性呼吸衰竭的重症监护病房患者的积极作用:单中心经验
J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Feb;23(1):27-33. doi: 10.1177/1751143720971543.
8
The role of CPAP as a potential bridge to invasive ventilation and as a ceiling-of-care for patients hospitalized with Covid-19-An observational study.CPAP 作为一种潜在的有创通气桥接手段和 COVID-19 住院患者的治疗上限的作用:一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244857. eCollection 2020.
9
RECOVERY- Respiratory Support: Respiratory Strategies for patients with suspected or proven COVID-19 respiratory failure; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, High-flow Nasal Oxygen, and standard care: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.RECOVERY- 呼吸支持:疑似或确诊 COVID-19 呼吸衰竭患者的呼吸策略;持续气道正压通气、高流量鼻氧和标准治疗:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jul 29;21(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04617-3.
10
Efficacy of non-invasive and invasive respiratory management strategies in adult patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.成人急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者无创和有创呼吸管理策略的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2021 Nov 29;25(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03835-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Reduced critical care demand with early CPAP and proning in COVID-19 at Bradford: A single-centre cohort.布拉德福德地区对新冠肺炎患者早期使用持续气道正压通气(CPAP)和俯卧位通气以降低重症监护需求:一项单中心队列研究
J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Nov;23(4):398-406. doi: 10.1177/17511437211018615. Epub 2021 May 21.
2
Use of CPAP Failure Score to Predict the Risk of Helmet-CPAP Support Failure in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study.使用持续气道正压通气失败评分预测COVID-19患者头盔式持续气道正压通气支持失败的风险:一项回顾性研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 May 5;11(9):2593. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092593.
3
Very late intubation in COVID-19 patients: a forgotten prognosis factor?
在 COVID-19 患者中非常晚期的插管:一个被遗忘的预后因素?
Crit Care. 2022 Apr 2;26(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03966-6.
4
Predictors of Helmet CPAP Failure in COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Prospective, Multicenter, and Observational Cohort Study.COVID-19 肺炎患者使用头盔式 CPAP 失败的预测因素:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性队列研究。
Can Respir J. 2022 Jan 21;2022:1499690. doi: 10.1155/2022/1499690. eCollection 2022.
5
Effect of Noninvasive Respiratory Strategies on Intubation or Mortality Among Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and COVID-19: The RECOVERY-RS Randomized Clinical Trial.急性低氧性呼吸衰竭和 COVID-19 患者应用无创性呼吸策略对插管或死亡率的影响:RECOVERY-RS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):546-558. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0028.
6
Observational study of changes in utilization and outcomes in mechanical ventilation in COVID-19.COVID-19 机械通气应用和结局的观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0262315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262315. eCollection 2022.
7
Incidence of Pneumothorax and Pneumomediastinum in 497 COVID-19 Patients with Moderate-Severe ARDS over a Year of the Pandemic: An Observational Study in an Italian Third Level COVID-19 Hospital.疫情一年期间497例中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征新型冠状病毒肺炎患者气胸和纵隔气肿的发生率:意大利一家三级新型冠状病毒肺炎医院的观察性研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 29;10(23):5608. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235608.
8
Non-invasive respiratory support in the management of acute COVID-19 pneumonia: considerations for clinical practice and priorities for research.急性 COVID-19 肺炎管理中的无创呼吸支持:临床实践的考虑因素和研究的优先事项。
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Feb;10(2):199-213. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00414-8. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
9
Is continuous positive airway pressure therapy in COVID-19 associated with an increased rate of pulmonary barotrauma?新冠病毒病中持续气道正压通气治疗与肺气压伤发生率增加有关吗?
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Oct 25;7(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00886-2020. eCollection 2021 Oct.
10
Barotrauma in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients Undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Literature Review.新型冠状病毒病患者行有创机械通气时气压伤:系统文献回顾
Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;50(3):491-500. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005283.