Santos João Miguel, Pereira Joana F, Marques Andréa, Sequeira Diana B, Friedman Shimon
Institute of Endodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.
Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, UICISA-E, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 3;57(6):573. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060573.
: Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in permanent mature teeth is a common indication for nonsurgical root canal treatment (NSRCT), but contemporary studies have reported on vital pulp therapy (VPT) applied in such teeth as a less invasive treatment. This systematic review assessed the outcomes of VPT, including partial and full pulpotomy performed with hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSCs) in permanent mature posterior teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. : The PRISMA guidelines were followed. The search strategy included PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and grey literature electronic databases. The quality assessment of the identified studies followed the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias, ROBINS-I and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tools. : The search of primary databases identified 142 articles, of which 9 randomized controlled trials and 3 prospective cohort studies were selected for review. The risk-of-bias was assessed as 'high' or 'serious', 'fair', and 'low' for three, seven and two articles, respectively. One to five years after VPT using HCSCs, the success rates mostly ranged from 78 to 90%. Based on two articles, the outcomes of the VPT and NSRCT were comparable at one and five years. Despite the necessity for the intra-operative pulp assessment in VPT procedures, the majority of the studies did not fully report on this step or on the time needed to achieve hemostasis. Small sample sizes, of under 23 teeth, were reported in three studies. : The reviewed 12 articles reported favorable outcomes of the VPT performed with HCSCs in permanent mature posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, with radiographic success in the range of 81 to 90%. Two articles suggested comparable outcomes of the VPT and root canal treatment. Universal case selection and outcome criteria needs to be established for VPT when considered as an alternative to NSRCT. This evidence supports the need for further research comparing longer-term outcomes of both of the treatment modalities.
恒牙成熟牙的症状性不可逆性牙髓炎是进行非手术根管治疗(NSRCT)的常见指征,但当代研究报道了在此类牙齿中应用活髓治疗(VPT)作为一种侵入性较小的治疗方法。本系统评价评估了VPT的疗效,包括使用水硬性硅酸钙水泥(HCSCs)对诊断为症状性不可逆性牙髓炎的恒牙成熟后牙进行部分和全部牙髓切断术的疗效。
遵循PRISMA指南。检索策略包括PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和灰色文献电子数据库。对纳入研究的质量评估遵循Cochrane协作偏倚风险、ROBINS-I和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表工具。
对主要数据库的检索共识别出142篇文章,其中9项随机对照试验和3项前瞻性队列研究被选入进行综述。分别有3篇、7篇和2篇文章的偏倚风险被评估为“高”或“严重”、“中等”和“低”。使用HCSCs进行VPT后1至5年,成功率大多在78%至90%之间。基于两篇文章,VPT和NSRCT在1年和5年时的疗效相当。尽管在VPT操作中需要进行术中牙髓评估,但大多数研究并未充分报告这一步骤或止血所需时间。三项研究报告的样本量较小,不足23颗牙。
综述的12篇文章报告了使用HCSCs对有症状性不可逆性牙髓炎的恒牙成熟后牙进行VPT的良好疗效,影像学成功率在81%至90%之间。两篇文章表明VPT和根管治疗的疗效相当。当将VPT视为NSRCT的替代方法时,需要建立通用的病例选择和疗效标准。这一证据支持需要进一步研究比较两种治疗方式的长期疗效。