Suppr超能文献

有症状不可复性牙髓炎患牙的活髓治疗:系统评价。

Vital Pulp Therapy in Teeth with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review.

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024 Aug 29;22:433-442. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5718325.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Nonsurgical root canal therapy (NSRCT) is indicated for management of permanent teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. However, recent research has suggested that vital pulp therapy (VPT) may be a less invasive option in these cases. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcomes of VPT, using hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSCs) including complete and partial pulpotomies in permanent posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PRISMA recommendations were adhered to. The search approach used electronic databases from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, ROBINS-I, and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tools were used to evaluate the quality of the selected studies.

RESULTS

The initial database search turned up 142 papers, of which 3 prospective cohort studies and 9 randomised controlled trials were selected for analysis. For three, seven, and two articles, the risk of bias was rated as 'high' or 'serious,' 'fair,' and 'low,' respectively. The success rates for VPT using HCSCs typically ranged from 78% to 90% one to five years following VPT. The results of the VPT and NSRCT were equivalent at one and five years, according to two articles. Although the intra-operative pulp assessment is essential for VPT treatments, most studies did not provide a thorough account of this process or the time required to achieve haemostasis. Three studies reported sample sizes that were 23 teeth. The 12 studies that were analysed revealed successful VPT procedures using HCSCs in permanent posterior teeth that had symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, with radiographic success rates ranging from 81% to 90%. Two articles claimed that the results of VPT and root canal therapy were equivalent.

CONCLUSION

When considering VPT as an alternative to NSRCT, appropriate case selection and outcome criteria must be created. This data highlights the need for additional studies contrasting the longer-term effects of different treatment regimens.

摘要

目的

非手术根管治疗(NSRCT)适用于诊断为有症状不可复性牙髓炎的恒牙的治疗。然而,最近的研究表明,在这些情况下,活髓保存治疗(VPT)可能是一种侵袭性较小的选择。本系统评价的目的是评估使用液压硅酸钙水泥(HCSC)进行 VPT 的效果,包括对有症状不可复性牙髓炎的恒牙后牙进行完全和部分活髓切断术。

材料与方法

本研究遵循 PRISMA 建议。使用电子数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和灰色文献)进行搜索。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表、ROBINS-I 和 Cochrane 协作风险偏倚工具评估所选研究的质量。

结果

最初的数据库搜索共产生了 142 篇论文,其中 3 项前瞻性队列研究和 9 项随机对照试验被选入分析。有三篇、七篇和两篇文章的偏倚风险分别被评为“高”或“严重”、“中”和“低”。使用 HCSC 进行 VPT 的成功率通常在 VPT 后 1 至 5 年之间为 78%至 90%。有两篇文章报道,VPT 和 NSRCT 在 1 年和 5 年的结果相当。尽管 VPT 治疗术中牙髓评估至关重要,但大多数研究并未详细说明该过程或达到止血所需的时间。有三项研究报告的样本量为 23 颗牙齿。分析的 12 项研究显示,在有症状不可复性牙髓炎的恒牙中,使用 HCSC 成功进行了 VPT 手术,其放射学成功率为 81%至 90%。有两篇文章声称 VPT 和根管治疗的结果相当。

结论

在考虑将 VPT 作为 NSRCT 的替代方法时,必须制定适当的病例选择和结果标准。这些数据强调需要进行更多研究,对比不同治疗方案的长期效果。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验