Dichtl Karl, Zimmermann Julia, Koeppel Martin B, Böhm Stephan, Osterman Andreas
Chair of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Max von Pettenkofer-Institute, LMU Munich, D-80336 München, Germany.
Chair of Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, Faculty of Medicine, Max von Pettenkofer Institut, LMU München, D-80336 München, Germany.
Pathogens. 2021 Jun 1;10(6):689. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10060689.
Despite the increasing relevance of Hepatitis E, an emerging disease endemic in developing and with increasing numbers of sporadic cases in industrialized countries, commercial tests are mainly based on batch oriented serological assays. In this retrospective study, we compared a line immunoassay (LIA; Line HEV, Mikrogen) and an ELISA (EIA; Anti-Hepatitis E Virus ELISA, Euroimmun) with a novel chemoluminescence immunoassay in a monotest format (CLIA; Hepatitis E VirClia, Vircell). Twenty sera of PCR proven cases of hepatitis E and 68 blood samples serologically pre-characterized were included. Applying the WHO reference standard, the CLIA demonstrated the highest analytical sensitivity for IgG and IgM. The combinations of CLIA/EIA (IgG and IgM) and CLIA/LIA (IgG) measurements showed substantial correlation. Compared to overall antibody detection (seropositivity in ≥2 assays), CLIA correlation was excellent, outperforming LIA (IgM) and EIA (IgG and IgM). Minor IgM cross reactivity in samples of patients with acute EBV infection was observed in all three assays. The CLIA showed good performance in diagnostic samples compared to established LIA and EIA assays. Due to its ready-to-use monotest format, the CLIA allows simple, time- and cost-effective handling of single samples. These qualities make the assay suitable for diagnostics, especially in the emergency setting and for low-throughput laboratories.
尽管戊型肝炎的相关性日益增加,这是一种在发展中国家流行的新兴疾病,且在工业化国家散发病例数量不断增加,但商业检测主要基于批量血清学检测方法。在这项回顾性研究中,我们将一种线性免疫测定法(LIA;Line HEV,Mikrogen公司)和一种酶联免疫吸附测定法(EIA;抗戊型肝炎病毒酶联免疫吸附测定法,Euroimmun公司)与一种新型的单检测形式化学发光免疫测定法(CLIA;戊型肝炎病毒化学发光免疫测定法,Vircell公司)进行了比较。纳入了20份经聚合酶链反应证实的戊型肝炎病例血清和68份血清学预先鉴定的血样。应用世界卫生组织参考标准,CLIA对IgG和IgM显示出最高的分析灵敏度。CLIA/EIA(IgG和IgM)和CLIA/LIA(IgG)测量结果的组合显示出高度相关性。与总体抗体检测(≥2种检测方法中的血清阳性)相比,CLIA的相关性极佳,优于LIA(IgM)和EIA(IgG和IgM)。在所有三种检测方法中均观察到急性EB病毒感染患者样本中存在轻微的IgM交叉反应性。与既定的LIA和EIA检测方法相比,CLIA在诊断样本中表现良好。由于其即用型单检测形式,CLIA允许对单个样本进行简单、省时且经济高效的处理。这些特性使该检测方法适用于诊断,尤其是在紧急情况下以及低通量实验室。