Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Kanagawa University, Kanagawa 221-8686, Japan.
Department of Architectural Design, Interdisciplinary Faculty of Science and Engineering, Shimane University, Shimane 690-8504, Japan.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 9;18(12):6258. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126258.
Since the development of the 5-point verbal and 11-point numerical scales for measuring noise annoyance by the ICBEN Team 6, these scales have been widely used in socio-acoustic surveys worldwide, and annoyance responses have been easily compared internationally. However, both the top two categories of the 5-point verbal scale and the top three ones of the 11-point numerical scale are correspond to high annoyance, so it is difficult to precisely compare annoyance responses. Therefore, we calculated differences in day-evening-night-weighted sound pressure levels () by comparing values corresponding to 10% highly annoyed (HA) on _%HA curves obtained from measurements in 40 datasets regarding surveys conducted in Japan and Vietnam. The results showed that the value corresponding to 10% HA using the 5-point verbal scale was approximately 5 dB lower than that of the 11-point numerical scale. Thus, some correction is required to compare annoyance responses measured by the 5-point verbal and the 11-point numerical scales. The results of this study were also compared with those of a survey in Switzerland.
自国际噪声委员会(ICBEN)第 6 工作组开发用于测量噪声烦恼的 5 点言语量表和 11 点数字量表以来,这些量表已在全球范围内的社会声学调查中得到广泛应用,并且可以方便地进行国际间的烦恼反应比较。然而,5 点言语量表的前两个类别和 11 点数字量表的前三个类别都对应于高度烦恼,因此很难准确比较烦恼反应。因此,我们通过比较在日本和越南进行的 40 个数据集的测量中获得的 _%HA 曲线上对应于 10%高度烦恼(HA)的数值,计算了日-晚-夜加权声压级()的差异。结果表明,使用 5 点言语量表的 10%HA 对应的数值比 11 点数字量表低约 5dB。因此,需要对 5 点言语量表和 11 点数字量表测量的烦恼反应进行一些修正。本研究的结果还与瑞士的一项调查进行了比较。